I think there are actually many such overlord clauses in life, and we often encounter them in our daily lives.

Most of the time, people just get by and forget it, and most of them are too lazy to care. In fact, many cases are obvious infringements. As a consumer, if you want to be serious, you can really argue with it. , and even complained to the Consumers Association.

Let me give you a very simple example:

Two days ago I went to buy sugar oranges. At that time, it was a stall on the roadside. The stall owner probably required a minimum purchase for convenience. The amount cannot be less than ten dollars.

I didn’t know about this so-called regulation at first. I picked some oranges there. Since the oranges were not very good, it was troublesome for me to pick them, so I didn’t bother to pick them. After that, I asked the stall owner to weigh it for me, and it only cost less than five yuan. The stall owner said he wouldn't sell it for less than ten yuan, so he just took a bunch of it and put it on the scale for me.

I quit at that time. You had so many bad oranges, and I couldn’t pick out a few good ones for a long time. If you give me a bunch of bad ones, can I have them?

In the end, the stall owner and I broke up on bad terms. He insisted on not selling for less than ten yuan, and I got angry and stopped buying.

I think the behavior of the stall owner is an obvious overlord clause. Whoever stipulates that I have to buy enough, and no one can control how much I want to spend.

There is also a lot of complaints on the Internet. A certain delicatessen shop likes to add scales to customers. People say that if they charge 20 yuan, the clerk can give them 50 yuan. This is obviously not true. It is reasonable and infringes on the rights of consumers.

As a consumer, I can choose not to care, but I can also choose to care. The key lies in whether I personally have the energy and whether I am willing to care.

There are actually many situations like this in our daily lives, such as the so-called refusal of outside drinks in restaurants, the non-return or exchange of special offers in stores, etc.

The so-called regulations of these stores are usually followed by a sentence: the final interpretation of the event belongs to the store. This is why it is obvious that there is no three hundred taels of silver here. For ordinary people, because they do not know enough about the relevant laws, they are led by the merchants. In fact, these behaviors are overbearing terms, and as a consumer, you have the right to refuse.

Many domestic merchants will formulate some "overlord clauses" in order to avoid subsequent troubles. As consumers, if we find that these clearly infringe on our rights, we can refuse to perform them. Some people choose to acquiesce to these terms because they are afraid of trouble. In fact, this is a kind of condonation of merchants' infringements, making them emboldened and taking some things for granted. Consumer rights are inviolable, and we, as consumers, should also stand up.