It is unkind to embezzle state-owned assets for the sake of wealth! Poach the country's corners! Deceive suppliers to cut off investors’ money! Owing huge sums of money and lining his own pockets by dividing the money! It is inevitable that many people will criticize it as a personal attack. The major media did not come out to speak out, and perhaps some people dare not speak out even if they are not allowed to speak out! Wait and let the bullets fly for a while!

Lenovo is a national brand enterprise that the Chinese people have always been proud of, but it was stolen by Liu Jiaozhu, a robber, and turned into a privatized enterprise. Fortunately, there are still many moral people in our country, especially Teacher Sima Nan dared to face Liangjian and asked six questions in a row, forcing Lenovo into a dead end, leaving Lenovo unable to answer, which was extremely ridiculous. The loss of state assets is not a small crime. I hope the state will investigate it strictly and give an explanation to the people.

Mr. Sima Nan is a very capable person. He is neither reporting nor making false accusations. He is analyzing and exposing. What is a personal attack? A personal attack is an unreasonable attack that only calls people out on the street. Sima Nan will never do it and does not do it. It can be said that the people at Lenovo can no longer sit still, and they will definitely use the means of their big capitalists to find guns for themselves. However, Lenovo has lost people's hearts. Even if it can unite all the entrepreneurs who have changed their vests to cheer for them, it will definitely fail in the end. While Sima Nan is tearing up Lenovo, I believe the relevant departments will not sit idly by.

He emptied the country and enriched his own treasury! I hope Mr. Liu will stand up and give a perfect and reasonable explanation to the Chinese people! ! Teacher Sima Nan who supports positive energy! ! Iron-clad!

Birds of a feather flock together, and people flock together. Society has been torn apart for a long time. If there are no associated events, there will be other events that will manifest themselves. It’s just that the sky of history chose Lenovo as the breaking point. Old Fusi was not surprised at all.

One dog barks, a hundred dogs bark, and when the populism is stirred up, anything can happen. The root cause is that there are few people reading and a lot of traditional culture has been lost. There are few who can think calmly and many who are headless!

Mr. Sima Nan’s soul-searching of Lenovo Group, especially Liu Yang, may not be an “incident”, but just raised several questions. There are both historical issues and practical issues. So, as long as Lenovo officials and Liu and Yang bravely stand up and refute them with corresponding facts to show the truth and let the public know the truth of the matter, that will be it. There is no need to carry out personal attacks. It is a waste of social resources and affects the development of enterprises!

As a melon-eater, I have also paid attention to this. Although I am not qualified to comment, I would like to raise the following questions:

1. Is the enterprise restructuring "the rich monk becomes poor?" temple"?

2. As a company affiliated to the Chinese Academy of Sciences, most of the management are foreign senior officials. Are you not afraid of leaking relevant secrets?

3. Are Liu Yang and Liu Yang senior officials of state-owned enterprises? Why is the salary so high? If it is a state-owned enterprise, this does not comply with national policies and regulations!

4. Lenovo has a heavy operating debt. Is it operating normally? Is there any "thunder explosion"?

l

The Lenovo incident makes the people not only think about and worry about the fate of more state-owned enterprises, but also the fate of the people!

They are all twists and turns, but the essence is one: is it involved in a crime? If he is guilty, he will pursue the stolen goods; if he is not guilty, he will not need to hide it, boldly show off his wealth, spend lavishly, and then buy out the remaining shares of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. To be a purely private enterprise, it does not rely on government procurement, nor does it expect the Chinese to buy. After all, it is a global enterprise, and the trademarks are not in Chinese, and they are taken away in a generous manner. It can be done unless prohibited by law. Since you are a godfather, you must face the believers openly.

Draw inferences from one instance, learn lessons, and make amends. It is recommended that this incident be used to comprehensively evaluate previous reforms, promptly analyze problems, identify problems, and correct problems. Medical and health reform, housing reform, and education reform, the three major reforms related to the national economy and people's livelihood, have exposed many practical problems. Can they be corrected?