Legal analysis: There are two kinds of prosecutions received: the first is a non-court summons, but other subjects inform the infringement by e-mail or other forms. At this time, it is necessary to first identify whether the other party owns the trademark category. If not, it can be ignored. If there is infringement and the other party fails to go through the court, it is mostly for private purposes, and enterprises only need to negotiate patiently. The second is a court summons. In this case, the prosecution finds that you are infringing, which has caused more or less negative effects to the other party.

Legal basis: Article 64 of the Trademark Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) * * * Where the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark claims compensation, and the accused infringer makes a defense on the grounds that the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark has not used the registered trademark, the people's court may require the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark to provide evidence of the actual use of the registered trademark in the previous three years. If the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark cannot prove that the registered trademark has been actually used in the first three years, nor can he prove that he has suffered other losses due to infringement, the accused infringer shall not be liable for compensation. If you sell a commodity that you don't know is an infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark, and you can prove that the commodity was legally obtained by yourself and explain the supplier, you will not be liable for compensation.