This was translated by myself, unlike those above who used translation tools.

Actually, I don’t care about your score, because I’m not sure if I’m doing it right, I’m just practicing my English, haha

Although the data generally supported the three hypotheses in the study, it is interesting that the hypotheses were not supported for all brands and product pairs

Although the data generally support the three hypotheses in the study, it is interesting that these hypotheses were not supported by all Brand and product portfolio support.

Explanations for this include limitations of this study, specifically, that the brands and product pairs were not the same in both parts of the study and the similarity (my understanding is that so many of the preceding sentences are is the subject and is less legible) ratings were less sensitive measures than the forced choices between sentence pairs.

A limitation of this finding is that brands and product mixes differed across studies and similar studies. The explanation, explicitly, is that the graded approach is less sensitive than forced choice in the middle of sentence combinations.

Still, it seems interesting to consider why a common brand name increased similarity perceptions for product pairs associated with some brands but not others

Still, it seems interesting to consider why a common brand name increased similarity perceptions for product pairs associated with some brands but not others

It still seems interesting to form a product portfolio that increases similar recognition while other brands cannot.

Perhaps the most likely explanation is that, by context or direct association, some brands add something more to natural product categories than do others.

Perhaps the most likely explanation is that, by context or direct association, some brands add something more to natural product categories than do others. Contact or direct association, some brands add more to the natural brand category than others.

Acknowledgments

David M. Boush is an associate professor of marketing at the Charles H. Lundquist School of Business at the University of Oregon. The author thanks the editor Robert Meyer and two other anonymous reviewers for their critical comments on the previous manuscript