This kind of behavior is more than touching porcelain, it is simply a rogue, it is out of thin air, and it is even more troublesome. First, Chanel's opposition to Huawei's registered trademark is somewhat bullying.

As a century-old brand of luxury goods, its status in the world is very high. I have to admit that its product reputation is really good, but we can't touch porcelain for no reason.

The trademark dispute between Chanel and Huawei actually started in 217. The cause of the incident was that Huawei applied to the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), a trademark agency, for approval to register its computer hardware trademark. The trademark pattern consisted of two vertical semicircles.

and Chanel's trademark is? Double c? Patterns, although they all look like double C's, are obviously very different. First, their positions are different. Second, the C's writing is different. In short, no matter how you look at it, there is no possibility of confusion between the two trademarks. Fortunately, the Trademark Office was rational and professional, and rejected Chanel's lawsuit. Second, Chanel refused to accept it?

Yes, after Chanel's claim was rejected by the Trademark Office, they appealed to the European Union General Court in Luxembourg again.

This is the appeal that the whole network knows, but there is no suspense. On April 21st, 221, the local court rejected Chanel's appeal again.

The appeal was rejected twice. This time, Chanel should be convinced and never appeal again.

In fact, no matter professionals or children who don't know anything, when they see Huawei's trademark and Chanel's trademark, they will feel that the two trademarks are completely different, not even similar. Obviously, Chanel's trademark curve is rounder and thicker, and the most obvious thing is the direction. The direction of Chanel C is horizontal, while the direction of Huawei C is vertical. No matter from which point of view, the two are not similar and cannot be confused.

But Chanel may still be unwilling. It is reported that Chanel will appeal to the EU Supreme Court again? The European Court of Justice appealed.

Of course, Chanel's touching porcelain behavior is understandable from their point of view. After all, she has a cautious obsession with her brand image for hundreds of years, but she can't be frightened.

Some netizens said: Chanel should sue Audi for infringement at the same time. Four circles are more like double C. After all, they are all horizontal. What do you think?