Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark registration - After being sentenced to fifteen years in prison, is Chairman Kang Baixin’s sentence for selling fake masks longer or shorter?
After being sentenced to fifteen years in prison, is Chairman Kang Baixin’s sentence for selling fake masks longer or shorter?

The Beijing High Court has just reported 9 criminal cases involving infectious diseases. 11 defendants were sentenced to criminal detention ranging from two months to 15 years in prison, and fines ranging from 10,000 yuan to 4 million yuan. Yuan does not vary. The reporter learned that this involved the fake mask case of Beijing Kangbaixin Pharmacy, and its chairman was sentenced to 15 years in prison in the first instance.

The Beijing Higher People’s Court was informed that in a case involving defendants Li 1, Li 2, and Luo selling counterfeit and shoddy products, defendants Li 1, Li 2, and Luo purchased the products from a city in Shandong More than 500,000 masks were purchased. And it is marked with 3M trademark suspected of infringement. According to the inspection by the inspection agency, the masks sold by it did not meet the corresponding national standards.

The Chaoyang Court held that the defendant Li and three other people bought non-compliant masks for sale at extreme prices. The behavior of the three people was very bad, and their behavior of pretending to be genuine constituted a crime. The three defendants were all convicted of selling goods with counterfeit registered trademarks. According to relevant regulations, they were found guilty of selling counterfeit and shoddy products and were punished.

The three defendants made a fortune during the epidemic. They knew that masks were in short supply during the epidemic, but they still persisted in buying unqualified masks at low prices and selling them, seriously damaging the economic order of the socialist market. Infringement of the legitimate consumption rights of consumers constitutes a hazard to epidemic prevention and control and should be severely punished.

In the same crime, Li and others were accomplices, and their punishments were reduced in accordance with the law. The court sentenced the defendant Li Mou 1 to a fixed-term imprisonment of 15 years and fined him more than 4 million yuan in accordance with the law. The remaining two people received lighter punishments in accordance with the law. In addition, in the suspected fraud case of Ma Mou heard by the Chaoyang Municipal People's Court, the court found out that the defendant Ma Mou fabricated the truth in Chaoyang District, Beijing and other areas, and defrauded the victim of more than 5 million yuan. When Yu pressed for protective clothing for emergency use, Ma kept using various means to delay the incident and was eventually prosecuted. The court sentenced Ma to 14 years' imprisonment and other corresponding punishments for the crime of fraud, and ordered him to return more than 5 million yuan to the victim.