A few days after the plagiarism of "Green Ji Ya" went online, 56 writers, directors and authors in the industry/kloc-0 boycotted Jing M. Guo He, and both of them were pushed to the forefront. At the end of the year, Jing M.Guo and the first published a letter of apology, apologizing to those who had been copied before. Therefore, the emergency withdrawal and merger of Qing Ji Ya should be related to this resistance.
Many people say that the reason for taking it off the shelf is that Jing M. Guo copied it a long time ago. However, the official reason is the problem of value orientation. I think the reason for taking it off the shelf is the movie itself. The special effects of the film itself are also plagiarized. Although I bought the copyright of Yin's novels, there are some unique things in the movie, and there are also copyright issues.
Besides, the biggest problem of the film is too much intentional bran and unnecessary male nudity. Weibo is full of nude photos of the leading actor to attract fans to contribute to the box office. Although homosexuality is not explicitly prohibited in China as in Muslim countries, it is not advocated. This kind of intentional bran, which is purely to attract attention and does not help the plot and nudity, is a wrong direction for young female audiences.
If such a film can also win high box office and influence in the shopping mall, it is not hard to imagine that in the near future, an investor will gather several top men's groups, play bran and take off his clothes to cheat the high box office.
In fact, in addition to the apparent reasons for industry resistance, the deeper reasons are: After the signing of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (RCEP), some details in the agreement have been gradually implemented. Chapter * * * of the agreement on intellectual property rights includes 83 clauses and two annexes on transitional organization and technical assistance. It is the most abundant and longest chapter in the RCEP Agreement, and it is also the most comprehensive chapter on intellectual property rights signed by China so far. Therefore, many long-debated intellectual property cases have recently been closed by the court (such as the Jordan case). The trademarks of Guo, Yu and Jordan are typical cases in the field of common sense property rights.
202 1 1 1, the Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC) will be formally implemented. The greatest significance of the classification of common sense property rights in this civil code lies in that it will breed the creation and development of common sense property rights system with strong humanistic spirit and private rights civilization, and provide the seeds of private rights and the genes of private law civilization for the regular evolution of common sense property rights system. The removal of Ji Ya marks a new stage of China's protection of intellectual property rights. Whether in the film industry or the literature industry, the behavior of safeguarding common sense property rights and optimizing the creative environment is beneficial to the present and the future.