Famous trademarks receive significant protection under Canada's Trademarks Act. The Trademark Act protects a trademark owner from others using a confusingly similar mark. Act 6 constitutes disorder. Section 6. In special circumstances, whether the use of one trademark in the United States with another trademark is likely to give rise to the inference that the use of the goods or services accompanying those trademarks is manufactured, sold, rented, leased or by the same person or undertaking, Whether the goods or services are of roughly the same category. Therefore, a trademark, well-known, can theoretically be protected against others who would use a similar mark for completely different products or services. This has led to some speculation that "well-known trademarks" are enforceable beyond the scope of the original trademark registration. Therefore, the trademark "well-known trademark" registered by a virgin, used by the original group company, can theoretically be enforced against any person or company Trademark virginity affects almost any product or service.

The Supreme Court of Canada case Mattel Inc. 3894207 v illustrates the confusion of legal issues that apply to well-known trademarks. The company, which owns a string of restaurants in the Montreal area, filed for trademark registration in order to protect its trademark, but the trademark office later objected to Mattel on the basis that it was said to be confusing with Mattel. Mattel's registered trademark, Barbie. The rival, Mattel, presented investigative evidence indicating that there was a likelihood of contact between the applicant's restaurant and the rival's trademark, despite Mattel's evidence. Mattel's board of directors rejected