Legal analysis: Trademark review cases include the following types:

(1) Cases in which a trademark registration applicant is dissatisfied with the Trademark Office’s decision to reject a trademark registration application and applies to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review ;

(2) A case in which the party is dissatisfied with the objection ruling of the Trademark Office and applies to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review;

(3) For a registered trademark, in accordance with the "Trademark Law" It stipulates that the parties apply to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for a ruling on revocation;

(4) Cases in which they are dissatisfied with the Trademark Office’s decision to declare a registered trademark invalid and apply to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review;

(5) ) is dissatisfied with the decision of the Trademark Office to cancel a registered trademark and applies to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review in accordance with the provisions of the Trademark Law.

Legal basis: "Trademark Review Rules" Article 2 According to the provisions of the Trademark Law and Implementing Regulations, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (hereinafter referred to as the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board) is responsible for handling the following trademark review cases:< /p>

(1) Cases of dissatisfaction with the decision of the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (hereinafter referred to as the Trademark Office) to reject a trademark registration application and application for review in accordance with Article 34 of the Trademark Law;

(2) Cases in which a person is dissatisfied with the Trademark Office’s decision not to register and applies for review in accordance with Article 35, Paragraph 3 of the Trademark Law;

(3) For a registered trademark, in accordance with Article 40 of the Trademark Law Article 4, Paragraph 1, and Article 45, Paragraph 1, provide for cases requesting invalidation;

(4) If you are dissatisfied with the Trademark Office’s decision to declare a registered trademark invalid, you shall, in accordance with Article 44, 2 of the Trademark Law, Cases involving application for reexamination in accordance with Article 54 of the Trademark Law;

(5) Cases involving dissatisfaction with the Trademark Office’s decision to revoke or not revoke a registered trademark and applying for reexamination in accordance with Article 54 of the Trademark Law.

In the trademark review procedure, the trademarks requested for review referred to in item (1) of the preceding paragraph are collectively referred to as the applied trademarks, and the trademarks requested for review referred to in item (2) are collectively referred to as the opposed trademarks. The trademarks requested for invalidation referred to in Item 3) are collectively referred to as disputed trademarks, and the trademarks requested for review referred to in Items (4) and (5) are collectively referred to as re-examination trademarks. In these rules, the aforementioned trademarks are collectively referred to as review trademarks.