First of all, administrative identification and judicial identification are distinguished according to the different identification methods and identification organs. Simply put, administrative determination refers to the determination of administrative organs, including the determination of trademark infringement cases by the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, the determination of objections by the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, and the determination of reexamination cases by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce. Judicial cognizance The Municipal People's Court recognized the case in the process of hearing it.

Second, the case finds that passive protection is the principle of well-known trademarks. Simply put, only when there are trademark infringement cases, trademark objection cases, trademark reexamination cases and trademark litigation cases, the rights of the infringed party can only be protected by identifying its trademark as a well-known trademark, and the infringed party claims that its trademark is a well-known trademark and can provide necessary and sufficient evidence, can it be determined that the identification result is only applicable to this case. Well-known trademarks can't be recognized voluntarily when there is no case, and the effect of one recognition is limited to this case, which may not be extended to other occasions. However, the fact that a trademark is recognized as a well-known trademark can be used as one of the evidences for requesting the recognition of a well-known trademark in other cases in the future.

To sum up, case identification is the principle of identification, and administrative identification or judicial identification is the way of identification.

I don't know if it's clear.