Jay Chou, the plaintiff, claimed that the restaurant had the following illegal acts without its own legal authorization: 1. Use the plaintiff's portrait on the electronic screen and wall-mounted TV in the restaurant.
Second, the menu cover and title page of the restaurant use the portrait of the plaintiff.
Thirdly, the portrait of the plaintiff is widely used in the decoration design of the restaurant, and the portrait of the plaintiff is used in the luminous wave portrait wall.
Fourth, on public platforms such as public comments and word of mouth, the restaurant was opened by the plaintiff, misleading consumers.
5. Use the plaintiff's personal logo at the entrance of the restaurant.
Jay Chou sued the restaurant and demanded compensation according to law.
But August 19, what's the name of this house? Hero j? The restaurant responded through its official Weibo. The official Weibo told the story of the establishment of the restaurant, and also showed that the restaurant was authorized by joining.
When J Xia Xiamen Store opened, Jay Chou and his partner vincent fang once expressed their congratulations. The above picture shows the relevant authorization responsibility letter displayed by the official Weibo.
Hero j? The restaurant said that as a franchise store, after learning that the authorization was suddenly suspended, they immediately contacted Beijing Magic Tianlun and made a series of rectification in coordination with Jay Chou's request, which was affirmed. However, in February 20 19, 19, they learned that the restaurant was sued, and the material evidence of the prosecution was the video and picture materials before they cooperated with the rectification.
Official Weibo posted relevant contracts and email screenshots to prove his innocence, and stressed that he never cheated consumers.
Now, Xiamen Haicang Court has officially heard the case and is still following up.