Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark registration - Touching porcelain trademarks in life
Touching porcelain trademarks in life
Introduction: Recently, a case happened that Monkey Valley sued Hericium erinaceus. This time, Monkey Gu claimed 500,000 yuan for Hericium erinaceus trademark, which is an act of safeguarding rights, because Monkey Gu and Hericium erinaceus are originally two different varieties. Hericium erinaceus is a kind of plant, while Monkey Gu belongs to an animal. The Hericium erinaceus biscuit developed by Jiangxi Juguang Group was named as Hericium erinaceus biscuit. Although it was recognized by the commodity market, Hericium erinaceus biscuit or Hericium erinaceus biscuit formed a certain connection with Jiang Zhong Group, so it was an act of safeguarding rights to sue Hericium erinaceus for a claim of 500,000 yuan.

First of all, we all need to know that Hericium erinaceus and Hericium erinaceus are not the same species, and naming Hericium erinaceus biscuits as Hericium erinaceus biscuits is a commercial infringement. At the same time, a company in Jiangxi sued Hericium erinaceus biscuit for trademark infringement, which was originally an act of safeguarding rights. Because you can't abuse the trademark and stick some other people's business cards on yourself at will, this lawsuit can better reflect the protection of rights.

At the same time, we should know that people's awareness of rights protection is very strong now, and they are named after knowing that the two species are not the same. This is obviously a very straightforward infringement. In this case, it will not help the proper marketing of our market and the competitiveness among peers, but will cause a very bad market environment. Therefore, this prosecution is also an insistence on self-protection and self-rights, and it is also to create a reasonable atmosphere for the market.

Monkey Gu sued Hericium erinaceus, not only safeguarding her own rights and interests, but also demanding trademark compensation of 500,000 yuan. This is an act of safeguarding rights. I hope relevant departments and relevant enterprises and industries can seriously safeguard their rights and legitimate rights and interests, and don't arbitrarily infringe on the copyright and rights and interests of others. In that case, they will only bring trouble to themselves. We must pay attention to the behavior of safeguarding rights. When others infringe on our rights and interests, we must bravely stand up and fight back.