1.

(1) The copyright of the script belongs to the cultural company. If A, B, C and D are all employees of the company, the script is a job creation; if not, it is a commissioned creation. In either case, the copyright belongs to the initiator, which is the cultural company.

(2) As part of the creative team, C only has the right of signature and no right to license privately.

2.

(1) If the evidence is sufficient, A can prove that its technology was produced before B applied for a patent and can be produced.

(2) Because the patent right belongs to Company B, A does not have the right to license as long as the patent is still valid.

3.

(1) According to the title, the trademark should be a geographical indication, and you can apply for registration as a collective trademark or certification mark. "Su Pear" is Category 31 in the International Classification.

(2) According to the meaning of the question, I want to answer that it cannot be approved; but the conditions given so far are seriously insufficient. According to legal provisions, it can only be said that under normal circumstances, a company in the second place cannot be successfully registered.

The "Trademark Law" clearly stipulates that "if a trademark contains a geographical indication of a product, and the product does not originate from the area indicated by the mark, and misleads the public, it shall not be registered and its use shall be prohibited." The cooperative proved that the name is a geographical indication, so Company B's "Pear" trademark will not be successfully registered, but other trademarks will have a chance. (Please note that it means "will not be registered successfully", not "cannot be approved", because Company B submits the application first, theoretically it will be reviewed first, and it is possible to pass the preliminary review, and then it will be objected or revoked.)

There are also restrictions on place names in the "Trademark Examination Standards". "If the place name contained in the trademark is inconsistent with the applicant's location, it is easy for the public to misunderstand and is judged to have adverse effects. The Trademark Law shall apply." "But there are exceptions. For example, "the names of administrative divisions below the county level" are not restricted. That is to say, if land A is only a certain village, then the trademark applied by company B has a chance to pass the preliminary examination. ; In addition, "place names with other meanings that are stronger than the place name itself" also have a chance to be successfully registered, such as Huangshan, Honghu, etc., and companies in the second place also have the opportunity to register. Of course, the premise is that the project is other than "Suli" or A cannot prove that the name is a geographical indication.

Overall analysis shows that due to insufficient conditions, the trademark applied by Company B still has a chance of being approved.