As long as the conditions are met, jurisdiction can be carried out (1) Level jurisdiction. First of all, the level jurisdiction of trademark cases is different from the level jurisdiction of general civil cases. According to the "Relevant Jurisdiction and Laws of the Supreme People's Court on the Trial of Trademark Cases" According to the provisions of the Interpretation of the Scope of Application, first-instance cases of trademark civil disputes shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's courts above the intermediate level. Each higher people's court may, based on the actual conditions of its jurisdiction and with the approval of the Supreme People's Court, determine 1-2 basic people's courts in larger cities to accept first-instance trademark civil dispute cases. (2) Regional jurisdiction shall be determined in accordance with the following principles: 1. Cases of infringement of trademark exclusive rights: Litigation filed due to infringement in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law shall be under the jurisdiction of the People's Court of the place where the infringement occurred or where the defendant is domiciled. Therefore, cases of infringement of trademark exclusive rights are generally under the jurisdiction of the intermediate people's court at the place where the infringement occurred or where the defendant is domiciled, or the grassroots court with jurisdiction over trademark cases. The place of infringement can be determined based on the provisions of Article 6 of the "Interpretations on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Civil Disputes over Trademarks". A civil lawsuit filed due to an infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark shall be determined by the place where the infringement is committed and the storage of the infringing goods. The people's court has jurisdiction over the place where the case was seized or the place of seizure or the defendant's domicile. The storage place of infringing goods refers to the place where infringing goods are stored and concealed in large quantities or regularly; the place of seizure and seizure refers to the place where customs, industry and commerce and other administrative agencies seal and detain infringing goods in accordance with the law. For the same lawsuit filed by multiple defendants involving different places where the infringement was committed, the plaintiff can choose the jurisdiction of the people's court where the infringement of one of the defendants was committed; for a lawsuit filed only against one of the defendants, the plaintiff can choose the place where the defendant's infringement was committed. The People's Court has jurisdiction. 2. Trademark contract dispute cases: According to the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law, lawsuits filed due to contract disputes shall be under the jurisdiction of the People's Court of the place where the defendant is domiciled or where the contract is performed. The parties to a contract may agree in a written contract to choose the jurisdiction of the people's court at the place where the defendant is domiciled, the place where the contract is performed, the place where the contract is signed, the place where the plaintiff is domiciled, and the place where the subject matter is located, but this law's provisions on hierarchical jurisdiction and exclusive jurisdiction shall not be violated. If the place of performance agreed upon by the parties is inconsistent with the actual place of performance, the actual place of performance shall prevail. Therefore, the intermediate people's court in the above location or the basic people's court with jurisdiction over trademark cases has jurisdiction. For trademark cases in which contractual liability and tort liability are concurrent, the competent court shall be determined according to the cause of action chosen by the parties. 3. Trademark rights dispute cases: shall be under the jurisdiction of the intermediate people's court where the defendant is domiciled or the basic people's court with jurisdiction over trademark cases where the defendant is domiciled. 4. Pre-litigation cessation of infringement and preservation cases: According to the Supreme People's Court's "Interpretation on Legal Issues Concerning the Pre-litigation Cessation of Infringement of the Exclusive Rights of a Registered Trademark and the Preservation of Evidence", the pre-litigation order shall be ordered to cease the infringement of the exclusive rights of a registered trademark or to preserve the evidence. Applications for evidence should be filed with the people's court that has jurisdiction over trademark cases at the place where the infringement occurred or where the respondent is domiciled. Based on what has been said above, once the conditions for trademark infringement are established, penalties will definitely be given based on the actual circumstances of the case. However, the jurisdiction over trademark infringement also depends on the type of case. The court also allocates it when jurisdiction over the case. Yes, cases that are not under their jurisdiction will generally be transferred directly to the place where they should have jurisdiction.