Wei Ya’s strict selection? She ran away with money and caused a heated discussion. In fact, when they first saw the four words “Weiya’s strict selection”, many people may have thought that this should be Wei Ya’s own live broadcast room. The recommended good products, in fact, have nothing to do with the anchor Wei Ya herself. What’s even more egregious is that, under the banner of Weiya, Wei Ya carefully selects to deceive consumers, and also uses the name of Weiya to deceive consumers. The purchaser's shopping money was taken away and ran away. After this incident was exposed on the Internet, Wei Ya herself immediately issued a statement, saying that "Weiya's Strict Selection" had nothing to do with her. In fact, this is not the first time that Wei Ya Yan Xuan’s deceptive methods have been exposed by the media. The media has exposed Wei Ya Yan Xuan’s deeds before. At that time, Wei Ya Yan Xuan paid a deposit of 50,000 to guarantee a sales donation of 200,000. Run away. Wei Ya Yanxuan has nothing to do with Wei Ya Wei Ya Yanxuan was established on May 21, 2020. Its actual shareholder is Li Huangguo, not Wei Ya herself or Wei Ya’s husband. Previously, Viya Yanxuan stated in its own advertisements that live promotion through special sessions or single links can achieve an input-output ratio of 1:4, which means paying a quarter of the deposit first to grab the bargain. The goods are good, and they claim that the deposit can be returned to the merchant after the transaction is completed. Many merchants were attracted by such preferential policies, so they signed a contract with the company "Weiya Yanxuan" and paid the deposit. However, after receiving the deposit from the merchant, Wei Ya Yan Xuan refused to live broadcast for various reasons. After the merchant found out, he began to ask Wei Ya Xuan for an explanation. There was really no way. Wei Ya Yan Xuan found a An inexperienced anchor conducted a live broadcast, but only 20 people watched in the live broadcast room. The merchants became anxious and wanted to return the deposit, but they could not be contacted. Wei Ya Yanxuan. Wei Ya sued Wei Ya Yan Xuan to court

Via, the anchor who brought goods, sued Wei Ya Yan Xuan to court on the grounds of unfair competition and asked the other party to stop using Wei Ya Yan Xuan. Two words and make amends. The Hangzhou Binjiang District People's Court accepted the case. Based on the trial, the court held that Wei Ya Yanxuan used anchor Wei Ya's fame to defraud the trust of merchants, seriously damaging Wei Ya's personal image, and required Wei Ya Yanxuan to immediately Delete his public *** account on social platforms, and his new nickname and personal introduction must not contain the word "Weiya". ?Weiya Yanxuan appealed against the first-instance judgment, and the second-instance court upheld the first-instance judgment.

Businesses should use fair competition to attract consumers, rather than defrauding the trust of others through this method. Live streaming is gradually becoming formalized, and no one or business can deceive consumers. .