Legal analysis: Using a tool without an author should not be considered an infringement. When quoting pictures, please indicate the URL. Generally, there is no prohibition on reprinting of pictures. If you use them and note the website, it does not count as infringement. If there is an author and you remove it instead of noting it, it constitutes an illegal act of infringing on intellectual property rights and you may be held legally responsible. The act is illegal. Copyright is an absolute right, and everyone is responsible for the obligation not to infringe on this right. Others must abide by copyright law and other relevant legal provisions when using copyrighted works. If an actor violates the provisions of the law, his behavior is illegal. As for works that are not protected by my country's copyright law, works that have not been copyrighted, or "works" that have entered the public domain, there is no infringement issue when others use them. 3. The perpetrator is subjectively at fault. The so-called fault refers to the infringer’s psychological state regarding his infringement and its consequences, including intentional and negligent forms. The vast majority of copyright infringements are intentional; there are also a few that can be caused by both intentionality and negligence. Distinguishing the form of fault has certain significance in determining the legal liability of the tortfeasor. Generally speaking, the legal liability for intentional infringement is heavier than the legal liability for negligent infringement

Legal basis: Article 47 of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China A registered trademark declared invalid in accordance with Articles 44 and 45 of this Law shall be announced by the Trademark Office, and the exclusive right to use the registered trademark shall be deemed to have ceased to exist from the beginning. Decisions or rulings declaring a registered trademark invalid, judgments, rulings, and mediation documents on trademark infringement cases made and executed by the People's Court before the invalidation, and decisions on handling trademark infringement cases made and executed by the industrial and commercial administration departments, as well as The executed trademark transfer or licensing contract does not have retroactive effect. However, compensation shall be provided for losses caused to others due to the bad faith of the trademark registrant. If the trademark infringement compensation, trademark transfer fees, and trademark usage fees are not returned in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph, which obviously violates the principle of fairness, all or part of the compensation shall be returned.