According to the provisions of Article 57 of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China, any one of the following acts is an infringement of the exclusive right to register a trademark:

( 1) Using the same trademark as the registered trademark on the same kind of goods without the permission of the trademark registrant; (2) Using the same trademark as the registered trademark on the same kind of goods without the permission of the trademark registrant Trademarks with similar trademarks, or the use of trademarks that are identical or similar to the registered trademark on similar goods may easily lead to confusion;

(3) Selling goods that infringe the exclusive rights of registered trademarks;

< p>(4) Forging or manufacturing other’s registered trademarks without authorization or selling forged or unauthorized registered trademarks;

(5) Replacing the registered trademark without the consent of the trademark registrant and replacing the trademark Products with trademarks are put into the market;

(6) Deliberately providing facilities for infringement of other people’s exclusive rights to trademarks and helping others to carry out infringement of exclusive rights to trademarks;

(7) Causing other damage to the exclusive right to use registered trademarks of others. Among them, if the exclusive right to use a registered trademark to others causes other damage, it is an infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark. In this case, the perpetrator used someone else’s registered trademark for door decoration, which could easily lead to misunderstanding among consumers and constituted an infringement of someone else’s exclusive right to register a trademark. Similar behavior is not uncommon in commercial activities. The judge reminded merchants not to take chances and take chances. They should build their own brand effects through legal channels and operate legally.