1, the reference materials are not authoritative (such as using personal media news, local TV stations, etc.). )
2. The reference materials do not correspond to the contents of the text editor (the reference materials say what happened in place A, while the encyclopedia text editor said what happened in place B).
3. The reference material is an authoritative news media platform, but the reference material manuscript involves soft-text propaganda.
5. There is no problem with the reference materials, but the edited encyclopedia copy involves expressions that do not conform to the encyclopedia specifications, and it may also be suggested that it is a reference material problem.
4. There is a disclaimer in the reference, and the editor is not responsible.
If the encyclopedia you submitted has been rejected, the reference materials are generally caused by the above reasons. You can compare and examine the reasons why your entries were rejected because of reference materials. If the adjustment still fails, some technical factors should be considered. Lohi likes to make suggestions on Wikipedia, and he can also find a third-party encyclopedia service to solve the problem of encyclopedia creation more professionally and worry-free. In addition, it is recommended that:
(1) Creating entries must be clear, and the typesetting should not look messy. This is the most basic work.
It is best to create an entry with pictures. Some friends reported that in the process of creating a Baidu Encyclopedia entry, the content was all written, but it was submitted several times and failed. Later, I added a picture, then submitted it, and the result passed;
(3) The content should be as original as possible, of course, it is impossible to be all original. It's best to check some information first, refer to how others organize encyclopedia copy, and set an example for others to organize encyclopedia copy from the objective point of view of a third party.