Me: Infringement is only a part of the case judged by intellectual property lawyers. All the problems revolved around infringement seem to exaggerate a certain aspect of the problem, and there are countless questions. The following points may all revolve around

A, and generally around the business source of intellectual property cases.

This is the first factor that determines income. Of course, those intellectual property tycoons may be worried, but they are also worried.

B, thinking about how to develop and how to break through

Most intellectual property lawyers will have a certain sense of urgency. In addition, internet plus's recent efforts in the field of intellectual property have made intellectual property lawyers less quiet. More than 9% of intellectual property cases are small-scale cases, with low awards and low lawyer fees.

2. When you see a strange call, you must show your brightest smile and be ready to answer all kinds of questions.

Me: Now all kinds of harassing calls seem to be quite rampant. Sometimes it is not necessarily brilliant to make you brilliant. If it is a weekend, it seems that you have to answer all kinds of questions, it is even less brilliant.

3, 3, with pirated software say no

Me: now it seems like a sci-fi movie with pirated sayno. say no and say bye bye may not be twins yet. Saying No may not be the same thing at all. As some defendants said in court, they will never infringe again. Just after they left the court, they told the vice president that they would continue to infringe at full speed.

Besides, under the present conditions, intellectual property lawyers may not be able to afford all genuine software. Besides, although the state says it wants to protect and support genuine software (of course, the state can't directly say that it doesn't support genuine software), it really needs to be comprehensive, that is to say, how much do we have to pay Eight-Nation Alliance for every percentage point increase in the genuine software rate?

4. Buy genuine toys for children

Me: The concept of genuine toys is still relatively new, and it is even fresher for ordinary people. Intellectual property lawyers are ordinary people, too, and they have to go to the market to buy food. Every steamed stuffed bun is earned by themselves, and the state does not give lawyers a penny. Besides, if you buy genuine toys, can you afford them? If you have two or three children at home, the agency fee collected every day may be enough to buy toys. Besides, if you buy toys, you have to buy other genuine ones, such as genuine books and movies, and you can't download music for free on the Internet. The Copyright Administration recently launched a ban on downloading pirated software. Isn't this a retrogression in history? It's just that I think so. In fact, I am also an ordinary person. When the role of intellectual property lawyers can't figure out many questions, we might as well go back to the thinking of ordinary people. The answer is simple, and all questions seem to be no longer problems. Why does the United States need a jury system? This restores the nature of law.

5. Never reprint other people's online articles

Me: This is even more impossible. There are a lot of articles copied all over the world. Now, please indicate where you copied them with respect. Besides, the future trend is to share the spirit. An important principle in the copyright field is to spread and share. In serious cases, you should pay a fee appropriately.

6. You can see a fake GUCCI bag at a glance

Me: This requirement is too high. First of all, female intellectual property lawyers may buy GUCCI bags, but do male intellectual property lawyers use them a lot? Anyway, I have never used them. Of course, I may be OUT. Of course, it may be more ostentatious to carry a GUCCI bag. I haven't even used a real GUCCI bag, so how can I recognize it? The key is to recognize it at a glance, which you may not be able to do for GUCCI's BOSS or designer, but this is too demanding for intellectual property lawyers.

7. When you see the patent number marked on the package, you will check whether it is true.

Me: Some intellectual property lawyers are patent lawyers, and of course I belong to them. I usually read too many patent numbers, just like the inspectors in the blood laboratory of the hospital. Do you want to read them again when I go home? Besides, it doesn't seem to matter much to us whether the patent number is true or not. It takes a lot of mobile phone traffic fees to check (of course, intellectual property lawyers can usually afford this money), but they really can't find out it's false, and they still struggle with themselves. What should I do next? Should I continue to buy it? Should I tell the patentee whether I should report it? It's really too tired. It's better to simply buy something and look at the production date, as long as it doesn't expire one day at the most.

5. After the fight between Wang Laoji and Jiaduobao, I only drank Wang Laoji

Me: This is even more inconsistent with me. Since the two quarrels, I stopped drinking Wang Laoji, but I supported Jiaduobao more. Do you know what it was like to see Jiaduobao? At first, I was worried, then I was distressed, and then I saw Jiaduobao slowly coming back to life, which made people see the spirit of hope, persistence, courage and perseverance, so this is a spiritual sustenance. Or I have hope when I see Jiaduobao. I predict that in the next three to five years (maybe it won't take such a long time), Jiaduobao will open up many streets that Wang Laoji doesn't know. Maybe Wang Laoji won't make herbal tea at all. This watershed actually lies in Wang Laoji's comprehensive efforts to stop Jiaduobao from using red cans. I don't know, when the two companies use red cans, consumers can't tell Wang Laoji from Jiaduobao. It's hard to tell who takes the light. Wang Laoji can still hang out for a few years, but now it's good. Jiaduobao suddenly changed clothes, and now the audience saw the true and false Monkey King clearly. Wang Laoji suddenly felt that there was no competitor, just like an old couple who often bickered. Suddenly one day, he left early and stopped bickering (in fact, there was nothing to do), and the other one would slowly die in loneliness, which may be the case with Wang Laoji. Therefore, there is a kind of * * * life called "unharmonious * * * life" or "unharmonious balance". Please cherish the Ta that quarrels with you around you. If you still don't understand it, I recommend a book called "No quarrel makes a good couple".

6. The pictures in the net are only matched with the paintings of writers who have been dead for more than 5 years.

Me: This is also difficult. I am not from the police station, and I don't have much energy to find out whose birthdates is. This is also not in line with the law of efficient operation of society. The paintings of writers 5 years after their death are just art and living culture, so they can't be eaten as food.

1. Keep a guide to patent examination at hand.

Me: This guide is generally aimed at patent lawyers, patent agents, or both (of course, me too, in this era, it is allowed to introduce myself properly). The guide to patent examination is really a good book. Patent lawyers from patent agents are all from science and engineering backgrounds at first. Now I know why I saw the drawings at all. What I learned in college is to look at drawings. Patent lawyers who are patent agents know how the patent right is obtained. They are more familiar with the procedures of patent authorization and confirmation, and have a better grasp of the scale of technology, which is also conducive to dealing with patent infringement lawsuits. For example, the principle of estoppel in the principle of patent infringement judgment is aimed at what the patentee said in the procedure of authorization and confirmation.

The Guide to Patent Examination was memorized during the examination. Now it seems that it is not much to keep it around. When you use it, you can turn it over from the bookshelf.

11. There must be mathtype in the computer

Me: My God, this is simply the rhythm of writing graduation thesis. This is the guy that teachers in colleges and universities like to bring, and more than half of intellectual property lawyers are trademark and copyright lawyers. It feels redundant to bring a math editor.

12. Access is basically in the Intermediate People's Court, and occasionally I go to the Supreme Court.

Me: This is in line with me. 99% of patent cases started in the Intermediate People's Court, and the Supreme Court didn't know when it lost its temper. It also approved several grass-roots courts (such as the courts in Yiwu and Kunshan) to hear patent cases, and the patent lawyers engaged were not simple enough. Now the trend of decentralization of intellectual property cases is obvious, and many grass-roots courts can try trademark copyright cases, so the gasoline fee has started to increase again.

13. When I see ip, I don't understand it as an ip address.

Me: Every time I see ip, I still understand it as an ip address, which may be the original intention of ip.

14. Even if I climb over the wall, I still use red apricots for a fee.

Me: At first, I thought that red apricots came out of the wall, but actually not many people climbed over the wall.

15. Never buy knockoffs just because they are similar.

Me: Shanzhai is a feature of China, and no one can be immune to it. Just like the food safety in China now, just like the air now, everyone is fair. The knockoffs depend on the field, such as mobile phones, electronic products, bags and clothes (many girls may buy knockoffs for the same clothes, and girls pay more attention to the styles).

16. I think Kong Xiangjun is more handsome than Daniel Wu.

Me: Handsome may not be useful for male intellectual property lawyers, or for men. Of course, all the female judges in intellectual property courts now hold up half the sky, and they are all young women judges. Is it necessary to sacrifice their color when they are in court? These female judges are all eye-catching and have developed a pair of discerning eyes, preferring wise men rather than just their looks. Therefore, Kong Xiangjun and Daniel Wu belong to two completely different men, with different ages, different ways, different fields and different looks. One depends on his face and the other on his brain. It also needs wisdom to connect these two people.

17. I never use the iphone, because I don't bring my own total recall.

Me: Most people use the iphone. Do you know the reason? Because the iphone is already an arcade, even our aunt uses the iphone, which shows how fair the society is now. Besides, I've been recording fairy tales for so many years, and I've never used the recording on the phone again (there's no empty talk). Work is work, but life still needs to return to life. I don't want to be a lawyer in life, so I should live more easily. I usually don't tell strangers, let alone tell them that I'm a lawyer, and others don't like to play with you.

18. You need an invoice for everything you buy, and you need to take a photo without an invoice.

Me: You only need an invoice for reimbursement, so it's better to live simply.

19. Seeing through Nanchang University for short, Nanda infringes the trademark right of Nanjing University and is suspected of unfair competition

Me: It's really hard to tell at a glance whether Nanda belongs to Nanchang University, Nanjing University or Nankai University. It depends on which school you are destined for.

2. I think it is more difficult to reply to patent examination opinions than to write proxy words.

Me: This may be aimed at patent lawyers. It is a unilateral act. It is only aimed at patent office examiners. If you can't reply once, you can do it a second time. If you reject it, you can also dismiss the review. You can also file an administrative lawsuit. In the authorization stage, as long as the invention and creation really make technical contributions, you will generally pay attention to it from the perspective of encouraging authorization. There are many ways and means of relief in the follow-up, and writing proxy words is not only aimed at the court, but also tortured by the opposing lawyer. In theory, there can be no mistakes, and some mistakes can't be made up. Because the opposing lawyer's eyes are staring at you, can you still say that it is more difficult to reply to the review opinions than proxy words?