It depends on whether the degree of similarity is confusing. If it is, it constitutes infringement. According to the provisions of China's Trademark Law, the following acts are infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark: 1. Using a trademark that is the same as or similar to its registered trademark on the same or similar goods without the permission of the trademark registrant; 2. Selling goods that infringe the exclusive right to use a registered trademark; 3. Forging or manufacturing others' registered trademark logos without authorization or selling forged or manufactured registered trademark logos without authorization; 4, without the consent of the trademark registrant, change its registered trademark and put the goods with the changed trademark on the market again; 5. Prominent use of words that are identical or similar to other people's registered trademarks as the name of the enterprise on the same or similar goods is likely to mislead the relevant public; 6. Copying, imitating or translating a well-known trademark registered by others or its main parts used as trademarks on different or similar goods, misleading the public, and possibly damaging the interests of the registrant of the well-known trademark; 7. Registering words identical with or similar to other people's registered trademarks as domain names, and conducting e-commerce of related commodities through the domain names, is likely to mislead the relevant public. Legal objectivity:

Article 64 of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China * * * If the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark requests compensation, and the accused infringer pleads that the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark has not used the registered trademark, the people's court may require the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark to provide evidence of the actual use of the registered trademark in the previous three years. If the owner of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark cannot prove that the registered trademark has actually been used in the previous three years, nor can he prove that he has suffered other losses due to infringement, the accused infringer shall not be liable for compensation. Anyone who sells a commodity that he does not know is an infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark and can prove that the commodity was legally obtained by himself and explain the supplier shall not be liable for compensation. Article 65 of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China * * * Where a trademark registrant or interested party has evidence to prove that another person is committing or is about to commit an act that infringes on his exclusive right to use a registered trademark, if it is not stopped in time, his legitimate rights and interests will be irretrievably damaged, he may apply to the people's court for measures to be ordered to stop relevant acts and property preservation before prosecution according to law.