1. Is ikun protected by law?

1. Ikun is protected by law as follows: Cai Xukun established IKUN as a trademark, and the trademark is protected by law. It is necessary to be aware of brand protection. Yes, it is mainly to prevent problems before they happen, and to make it easier for public figures to use their trademarks to establish their own brands when they have independent creations in the future. At the same time, individuals also have the right to control the creation, promotion and operation of their trademarks.

2. Legal basis: Article 3 of the "Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China"

Trademarks approved and registered by the Trademark Office are registered trademarks, including commodity trademarks and service trademarks And collective trademarks, certification marks, trademark registrants enjoy exclusive rights to trademarks and are protected by law.

2. Is the cohabitation agreement protected by law?

1. The cohabitation agreement is protected by law as follows:

Is the cohabitation agreement valid? There are many questions about whether it is protected by law. Issues that men and women who live together worry about. According to the provisions of our country's laws, a cohabitation agreement is an expression of the true intentions of both parties. The parts that do not violate national laws and regulations and are operable have legal effect. The parts that violate national laws and regulations, public order and good customs, or lack reasonable feasibility are not protected by law. That is to say, unmarried men and women live together, and the provisions in the cohabitation agreement regarding property ownership and liability for claims and debts are protected by law. Whether a property compensation agreement for unilateral termination of a cohabitation relationship is valid depends on whether the agreement infringes upon the rights of a third party, whether it violates the law and social ethics, and whether it limits the personal rights of others. If one party registers a marriage with another person in accordance with the law, the other party cannot restrict the other person's marriage by using compensation for dissolving the cohabitation relationship. If such a clause is agreed upon in the agreement, it will ultimately be difficult to obtain legal protection. For example, the cohabitation agreement stipulates that one party shall not initiate a breakup, and that a breakup fee must be paid, etc. These are all violations of personal rights and are not protected by law. Therefore, any cohabitation agreement that stipulates property, debts, child support, living expenses, etc. within the scope prescribed by law is protected by law. Clauses that restrict physical separation, housework, etc. are invalid, which means that such cohabitation agreement clauses are not protected by law.