The Trademark Office’s 2015 Trademark Variation No. 0000046274 ruling is unfair. Our company has registered the (Bunnymiffy) trademark Class 12, but Maxis Company (Miffy) has not registered the Class 12 trademark. The Trademark Office Although it admitted that our company's trademark was not similar to the other party's (the other party had not registered it), it still ruled that our company's trademark should not be registered. The Trademark Office said that the other party's trademark was well-known in other fields, and even denied the registration of our company's trademark when others did not need to register the trademark.

As for other objections raised by Maxis Company, our company has obtained trademark certificates for some of the trademarks; the certification trademark office did not consider the two trademarks to be similar from the beginning; our company believes that this ruling is unfair

If you are dissatisfied with the Trademark Office’s decision not to register, you can apply to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review.

Related recommendations: Reasons for rejection of BEEBEE trademark similarity

Trademark similarity was rejected, review evidence provided to see if the online store is valid

Lianhai Furniture trademark and Hailian Plastic What are the similarities between citations