NIKE clothes are indeed expensive and low-end ones are not expensive, but there is no doubt that they belong to high-end sporting goods brands, and their agency joining fee is sky-high which ordinary people can't afford. Why does the landlord's mother want to represent the low-end women's clothing brands aged 3-5 to mention NIKE?
Disney casual handbags are good, and the sales of clothes are very bleak.
Senma middle school students wear clothes that can dress up, and college students don't wear them.
Li Ning also belongs to high-end sports. The joining fee for goods above is also very high, and none of them meet the requirements of women's wear aged 3-5
Hello, landlord. I suggest that low-end goods are really boring to open. The price of clothes is 2-3, and there is no brand. It may be that many people don't like it. Although the investment is small, the risk is not small.
I suggest that the landlord's mother can at least hold back repeat customers and won't buy it for two days. The brand of mid-range clothes is still right or wrong. For example, the brand "Minzi" in Shanghai was favored by working women aged 3-4 years in the past two years, and the purchase price of clothes was around 5. More brands can go to the local wholesale market for reference. Although this kind of clothes is not as good as the big brands such as "Shengyuzhu", the style and workmanship of clothes are all excellent. < P > It is worth mentioning that 3-4 and 4-5 are completely two concepts, and people over 4 don't know much about it.