Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark registration - Since Mengniu and Yili Dairy have had problems, will you continue to choose Mengniu and Yili?
Since Mengniu and Yili Dairy have had problems, will you continue to choose Mengniu and Yili?

Will it or not

Is it important?

After reading this article

The two paragraphs that sent chills down my spine the most:

Because the quality is not up to standard, in order to compete for the market quickly, we go to Adding various chemicals to milk has become the default unspoken rule of major dairy companies. Since leading companies like Mengniu and Yili are not afraid of adding more, what are you afraid of? What's more, as long as you don't work hard to increase and seize the market, you can't survive in the shadow of Mengniu and Yili.

If the fat is low, add fat powder; if the bacteria exceed the standard, add antibiotics; if the concentration is low, add whey powder; if it becomes sour, add alkali to neutralize it; if the protein is low, add melamine to fool it around. The milk after adding these things can only last six or seven hours. Therefore, hydrogen peroxide should be prepared in the vehicle that delivers milk for inspection, and be poured in immediately before inspection.

In 2008, the big-headed doll incident came to light, and Sanlu became a street rat that everyone shouted to beat. Melamine almost became a nightmare for a generation. Until today, 22 years later, in May, the "big-headed doll" in Chenzhou, Hunan "Report, even though the report stated that it was not caused by melamine, it still caused a panic and the nightmare of the past was awakened.

Someone took the blame for the melamine incident in 2008, but what is the solution?

In 2010, Mengniu and Yili claimed that due to the melamine incident, they could not add industrial raw materials to milk, so they could not improve the quality of milk sources and milk-making technology, so they lowered their inspection standards. Once the result drops, it will be the lowest in the world.

The protein content has been reduced from the old national standard of no less than 2.95g/100g to 2.8g/100g. The colony count should not be higher than 2 million CFU/ml (the lower, the better), which is 1.5 million higher than the old national standard. In contrast, the standards of the United States and the European Union are much higher than ours. The United States requires milk protein to be no less than 3.1 grams/100 grams, the total number of colonies should not exceed 300,000 CFU/ml. The European Union has higher requirements, with the protein not less than 3.3 grams/100 grams and the total number of colonies not higher than 100,000 CFU/ml. You may not be too sensitive to these data, but let me put it bluntly - milk with a protein content of less than 3g is garbage.

In the two years from 2008 to 2010, it is unknown how certain dairy industries in China responded to the industry crisis. However, judging from the 10-year standard, it should be that they chose to join in the misfortune after learning from the experience.

Since the standards were revised in 2010, that is to say, in this 10 years of scientific and technological innovation and advancement of the times, what everyone drinks is lower than the standard 10 years ago, with more bacterial colonies and lower protein content. Low milk!

And so far, no major quality issues have caused any major disturbances, which means that if nothing unexpected happens, this set of standards is likely to be used forever.

Now that this matter has been put on the table and exposed in the sun, everyone has begun to call for a boycott, and then what?

Buy other domestic brands

Which domestic dairy company does not belong to the China Dairy Products Association?

This is the case with the corporate products of the National Dairy Association. How dare you buy them if you haven’t even entered the National Dairy Association?

And you think you won’t buy it if you say you don’t want to buy it?

Now these two companies have occupied a considerable market in China