hello, that's infringement. There are many similar cases in the dispute over simplified and traditional trademarks. If an enterprise only registers simplified or traditional trademarks, it may involve the dispute over simplified and traditional trademarks. "Trademarks have the same pronunciation and different glyphs, which is similar to the use of trademarks in the Trademark Law."

article 57 of the trademark law stipulates that without the permission of the trademark registrant, using a trademark similar to its registered trademark on the same commodity or using a trademark identical to or similar to its registered trademark on similar commodities is likely to lead to confusion, which is an infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark.

so how to judge trademark approximation? If the pronunciation and font of Chinese trademarks are the same, and the graphics and letters in the trademarks are the same or similar, which is easy to confuse ordinary consumers, it can be considered as trademark similarity. Simplified and traditional trademarks have the same pronunciation and meaning, and should belong to similar trademarks.

The law does not exclude legally established enterprises from legally using their own business names, but the use of business names by enterprises in business activities should be standardized, and the legitimate rights and interests of others should not be harmed. If enterprises need to simplify their business names properly and involve and use relevant logos in the course of business operations, they should pay attention to the premise of not infringing on the legitimate rights and interests of others.

if you can give detailed information, you can give a more detailed answer.