2, whether the same or similar, and cause confusion between the goods, services and services operated by the parties, and whether the goods and services are the same or similar, and cause confusion and misunderstanding, is also an important factor to judge whether the infringement constitutes. When judging, we should not only compare the main parts of the dispute, but also judge the whole.
3. The logo should have certain uniqueness. If it is a common name generally recognized by ordinary operators and ordinary consumers, one party does not enjoy the exclusive right, nor can it exclude the legitimate use of other operators.
Legal basis: Article 57 of the Trademark Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) commits any of the following acts, all of which are violations of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark:
(1) Using the same trademark as its registered trademark on the same commodity without the permission of the trademark registrant;
(2) Without the permission of the trademark registrant, using a trademark similar to its registered trademark on the same kind of goods, or using a trademark identical with or similar to its registered trademark on similar goods is likely to cause confusion;
(3) selling goods that infringe upon the exclusive right to use a registered trademark;
(4) Forging or unauthorized manufacturing of registered trademark marks of others or selling forged or unauthorized registered trademark marks;
(five) without the consent of the trademark registrant, the registered trademark is changed and the goods with the changed trademark are put on the market again;
(6) Deliberately facilitating the infringement of the exclusive right to use a trademark of others and helping others to commit the infringement of the exclusive right to use a trademark;
(seven) causing other damage to the exclusive right to use a registered trademark of others.