Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark registration - What are the main tests of economic law in the judicial examination?
What are the main tests of economic law in the judicial examination?

In the 2007 Judicial Examination, economic law, intellectual property law and commercial law were distributed in papers one, three and four respectively, with ***102 points!

The score distribution is: Economic Law has a score of 40 points, maintaining stability over the past four years; commercial law has a score of 50 points, highlighting its always important position; Intellectual Property Law has a score of 12 points, which is a normal reflection;

The distribution of test points is:

(1) Economic Law:

Anti-Unfair Competition Law: 1. Administrative monopoly, designated purchase of goods; 2. Confusing behavior;

Tax Collection and Administration Law: 1. Enforcement Scope restrictions;

Land Management Law: 1. Resolution of collective land ownership disputes; 2. Temporary land use issues; 3. State-owned land transfer scope;

Land Contract Law: 1. Establishment Nature and content;

Bidding Law: 1. Legal nature of the bid winning notice; 2. Scope of projects that must be bid;

Labor Law: 1. Situations for extending working hours; 2. Procedures for enterprise layoffs; circumstances; compensation;

Environmental Protection Law: 1. Formulation of local environmental protection standards; 2. Environmental infringement;

Quality Law: 1. Defect tort liability;

Consumer Law: 1. Consumer rights;

Banking Supervision Law: 1. Information sharing mechanism; 2. Establishment of commercial banks;

Personal income tax: 1. Tax-free items and taxable items; 2.

Corporate Income Tax Law: 1. Tax-free items;

Auction Law: 1. Restrictive rules for auctions;

Securities Law: 1. Nature of securities;

(2) Intellectual Property Law:

Copyright Law: 1. Infringement;

Patent Law: 1. Infringement and fair use; 2. Maintenance and loss of novelty;

Trademark Law: 1. Components of a trademark; 2. Registration procedural rules;

(3) Commercial law:

Company law: 1. Regulations for the establishment of joint-stock companies; 2. Capital contribution methods; 3. Equity transfer; 4. Rules for investment entities in one-person companies; 5. Compulsory dissolution; 6. Subrogation litigation; 7. Capital contribution rules; 8. Division procedures;

Partnership law: 1. Qualifications of general partners; 2. Liability of limited partnerships; 3. Joining a partnership

Bankruptcy Law: 1. Types of applicants for bankruptcy reorganization and settlement; 2. Scope of the debtor's property; 3. Scope of rights of the administrator; 4. Executive rules of the administrator;

Negotiable Instruments Law: 1. None Causeability and independence; 2. Payment rules;

Insurance law: 1. Characteristics of liability insurance;

Regarding the business law proposition of the 2007 Judicial Examination, I think it can be briefly summarized The following characteristics:

1. Reflects the basic value test points of this department’s law and meets the requirements of current judicial practice.

Compared with the extremely "biased" propositions of the previous year, it can be said that the business and economics questions of the 2007 Judicial Examination are in line with the proposition direction of the examination requirement of "the most important ones should always be given weight";

2. Reflect current social hot spots.

Paying attention to the current situation is a must for social science, which is to study human affairs! This year can be said to be obvious. For example, environmental issues were included in the national judicial examination reform for the first time last year and will continue to be examined this year. This is consistent with global attention to environmental issues. This is how it should be. If no one cares about it, wouldn’t it be redundant to test it! Isn’t it a nerdy proposition! Another example is the comprehensive proposition on the legal adjustment of urban residential properties and the bidding law.

3. Moderate difficulty.

As long as you have a solid grasp of the basic knowledge of commercial and economic law, it is not a problem to be a good candidate!

The judicial examination questions are not about competing with the candidates! They are about selecting for the country. Talents, so always maintain a highly responsible attitude towards the country and the candidates. It is the basic responsibility of the judicial examination management agency of the Ministry of Justice and its employees to answer questions and mark papers!

As for the department I am speaking about From the perspective of law, this year’s proposition has been greatly improved!

I briefly summarize the characteristics of commercial and economic law:

1. The total score is considerable, and there is no total score in that discipline. The score can reach more than 100 points, except for this departmental law;

2. The scores are scattered, and the scope of the test involves about 30 basic laws, about 20 important regulations and rules, and about 10 judicial interpretations;

p>

3. It is better to prepare early, otherwise you will be panicking before the exam;

Importantly, everyone knows and pays attention to the method of concentration of scores, so you cannot rely on those methods to increase your score. The experience of those who have ranked first in the country or the province in several exams: Learn business law well!

==================== ======================================

Okay, here is My original work:

In terms of points, economic law is generally 40 points, but the examination is very scattered.

Anti-monopoly and anti-dumping are traditional test points, Food Safety Law and Labor Contract Law are emerging test points, Negotiable Instruments Law and Securities Law are general test points, and other test points are scattered. Basically, both traditional test points and emerging test points require a little more, and for bills and securities, two to four points are usually enough, and the same goes for other tests.

Don’t listen to Zhang Haihai on economic law. It’s a bit messy. I admit that his commercial law is pretty good. But for economic law, I personally think it’s better to listen to Yan Mengxuan (the name may be wrong).

Hope this is helpful to the original poster.