1. Why apply for civil servants?

Analysis: Regarding the reasons for applying for civil servants, candidates can answer from three aspects:

(1) Yes understanding of civil servants. Civil servants are personnel who perform national official duties and represent the country in the management of social and public affairs. Dr. Yang made a vivid metaphor about the role and importance of civil servants in the operation of national government agencies: ordinary people are like people riding in cars, while civil servants are like drivers. They must not only understand the technology, but also know the road, judge the direction, and navigate the situation. The driver of the car should be careful not to fall into the ditch. :

(2) The purpose of taking the civil service examination. Mainly, I want to give full play to my strengths and better serve the country and the people in order to realize my own value. At the same time, the stable income and certain status of civil servants in society are also one of the reasons that attract candidates to apply for civil servants;

(3) The conditions for applying for civil servants. (Example: I graduated with a major in Chinese language and literature and have certain word processing abilities; 7 years of grassroots management work has given me strong coordination and organizational skills; 8 years of computer learning experience has enabled me to use computers quite proficiently. Perform various operations (such as word processing, preparation of reports, daily maintenance, common troubleshooting, sending and receiving emails online, searching for information, designing simple software, making general web pages, etc.), which can fully meet the needs of modern secretarial work; at the same time, My interest in Chinese has made me full of enthusiasm for the position I applied for. Although I am slightly older than other candidates, I am healthy, motivated and energetic, and I have accumulated more than ten years of work experience. The experience is unmatched by ordinary young people. I remember someone said that if you can combine your interests, hobbies and career well, you can do your best. I think I can)

2. What if you are not admitted this time?

Analysis: Today’s society is a competitive society. This can also be seen from interviews. If there is competition, there will be pros and cons, and if there is success, there will be failure. There are often many reasons behind success. Difficulties and setbacks, if you fail this time, it is just once. Only through the accumulation of experience can you create a complete winner. This question can be answered from the following aspects:

First, we must dare to face it, do not be discouraged in the face of this failure, accept the reality that we will not look back if we have lost this opportunity, and psychologically Resistance to this defeat was demonstrated in will and spirit. You must have confidence and believe that after this experience, you will be able to do it and surpass yourself through hard work.

Second, be good at reflection. You should carefully summarize and think about the experience of this interview, and be able to learn from your own experience. Find the gap with the angle. Treat yourself correctly, evaluate yourself realistically, look at your own strengths and weaknesses dialectically, and be a sensible person.

Third, to get out of the shadows, you must overcome the psychological pressure this failure brings to you and always remember yourself. Weaknesses, take precautions before they happen, strengthen learning, and improve your own quality.

Fourth, work seriously. After returning to the original unit, work in a down-to-earth manner. Thirty-six lines, Be the best in the industry and strive to achieve certain results in this position.

Fifth, keep up the good work and strive to realize the dream of becoming a national civil servant, and will participate in the competition again if there is an opportunity in the future.

3. Can you talk about your strengths and weaknesses?

Analysis: This question mainly tests the candidates’ correct understanding of the basic qualities of talents and whether they can evaluate themselves comprehensively and objectively. The answer to this question can also tell the examiner whether the candidate is confident (or proud or inferior). In addition to paying attention to the above three points when answering, candidates should also pay attention to the following points:

(1) Although this is your subjective evaluation, it is greatly affected by personal confidence, value orientation, etc., that is, The advantages and disadvantages you describe may not match the actual situation, but your statement will affect the examiner's judgment of your ability to a certain extent. For example, if a candidate modestly says that his language expression skills need to be improved, then even though your language is fluent, clear in structure, well-organized, and able to make full use of non-verbal symbols during the interview, the examiner's conclusion will be more or less rejected by the candidate himself. The impact of sexual conclusions.

(2) As a "social person", candidates actually have many advantages, such as: diligent study, strong collective concept, and good at analyzing problems.

Interpersonal communication skills, even listening to your mother, and being loyal to love are also advantages, but candidates must highlight the key points: outstanding characteristics and advantages related to the position they are applying for. If the advantages repeatedly emphasized by candidates are actually very general, it will be counterproductive. Similarly, when talking about shortcomings, we should start from these two points, but the specific treatment is exactly the opposite; one is to "avoid the truth and focus on the weak", talk about insignificant small shortcomings, rather than being too frank and exposing major flaws in one's ability structure, and the other It talks about some shortcomings that have nothing to do with or have little to do with the position you are applying for. For example, if you apply for the position of archivist in a certain bureau's data room, you can openly admit that your ability to organize large-scale social activities is poor. In addition, there is a "speculative" method, which is to talk about your "safety shortcomings", that is, those shortcomings that are shortcomings in some situations, but may be advantages in other situations. For example, you have a relationship with someone who is irresponsible for their work. People who are difficult to get along with often cause delays in work due to demanding that they do things perfectly. However, this "safety shortcoming" can easily make experienced examiners think you are "glib", so you should use it with caution!

(3) When talking about advantages, you should pay attention to your expression, demeanor, tone, etc., and please handle it in a "low-key" manner. Sometimes you can express your hope and efforts to "get to the next level"; when talking about your shortcomings, don't stop at the shortcomings themselves, but focus on your determination and actions to overcome the shortcomings.

4． Ideas for answering the question about "career goals"

"A soldier who doesn't want to be a marshal is not a good soldier." Everyone should have their own career design. When describing such questions, you should answer them based on the characteristics of the position you are applying for. Some positions require candidates to go above and beyond. For example, a groundbreaking position requires candidates to be ambitious. On the other hand, some positions require candidates to be loyal to their duties and endure loneliness. For example, some professional skills and highly skilled positions.

5. Ideas for answering questions about "job hopping".

The topic of "jumping" is also a thorny issue. There are many reasons for turnover and resignation. When answering such questions, candidates should have a calm mind and an objective narrative. If you have the experience of transferring units multiple times, prepare your response ideas in advance.

If the candidate is a professional "ADHD", two situations may occur: one is that the ability level is relatively high and there is a motivation to try, so he always challenges the profession and himself; the other is The first situation is that the relative ability is relatively poor, there are few opportunities for self-selection, and the main factor in leaving the job lies in the unit. Therefore, when candidates describe their resumes, while highlighting their rich experience, they must also take into account the fact that many employers do not like to recruit employees and staff whose "job-hopping" is an unstable factor.

6． Response ideas on "How to treat others"

How you view others and yourself are important indicators of whether a person has team awareness, public relations awareness and learning awareness. If a person cannot view himself or others correctly, he cannot view work correctly. In the civil service examination, when it comes to colleagues around you, candidates should evaluate themselves just like themselves. The advantages should outweigh the disadvantages. On the premise of affirming the advantages, look at the shortcomings of colleagues. If talking about yourself and talking about others during the interview belong to one group of questions, then it is best to talk more about yourself and less about your colleagues. You must be measured and express your position appropriately.

7. Ideas for answering questions about "choosing career and interests"

During the interview process, candidates will often encounter "dilemma" choices, such as "choosing personal interests and career". A simplistic answer is not a very satisfactory answer. We should regard "interest choice" as a value choice, a choice of the principle of fairness, and a choice of challenging ourselves. Of course, the main premise is the choice of career. During the interview, you must adhere to this principle, otherwise, it means that you will give up this opportunity.

8． Ideas for answering questions about "family background"

Social background and family background have a very important impact on a person. The examiner will generally ask about the candidate's family situation, such as family size and work situation, family financial resources and income. When answering questions in this area, candidates should describe the purpose of the test. For example: the help of the family environment to quality development, especially the help of the family environment to future jobs, is what the examiners are interested in. That is to say, good family conditions will play a positive role in the formation of a person's personality.

On the other hand, if the family conditions are not good, it may also contribute to the development of excellent qualities in a person. This is just like what we usually say, "The children of the poor will become rich early" and "The generals will have no seeds, but the ministers will emerge from the white house."

9． Ideas for answering questions about "Expression of Expertise"

When describing their own expertise, candidates must pay attention to being less but more precise, and do not generally list things that are not their own expertise. During the interview process, problems sometimes arise when candidates answer questions about their own hobbies and hobbies. For example, when the candidate mentions his or her hobbies and specialties, the examiner may be interested or have objections, and then ask you to describe them. . If you answer inappropriately or incompletely, it will not only make the examiner think about your self-evaluation, but more importantly, it will affect your test scores.

Test takers should know. Why do most units value candidates' specialties and hobbies? Mainly because specialties and hobbies help improve two abilities of people: one is a positive desire for performance and a positive, optimistic, and upward attitude towards life; the other is people who are good at performance, The first is someone who is open and receptive. An open and receptive mind is a necessary condition for a person's development.

10. Ideas for answering "tricky" questions

During the interview process, there may be two types of questions with different purposes. One is a normal quality and ability test question, and the other is an extraordinary quality and ability test question. Sometimes, examiners improvise challenging questions based on pre-designed questions; such questions are regarded as "high-level questions" in interviews, and candidates must not take such questions lightly. Perhaps it is precisely for such questions The answer to the question determines the success or failure of the interview. For example, tax officials may be asked to face the challenge of impartial enforcement of the law and the temptation to bend the law for personal gain. For example: "If you were a tax administrator and your relatives committed tax evasion within your jurisdiction, how would you deal with it?" Faced with similar questions, candidates cannot answer simply, because in real life Such questions themselves are not simple ones. When tax officials face the problem of tax evasion by relatives in your jurisdiction, they can choose to enforce the law impartially, or they can discuss the matter on a case-by-case basis, or they can discuss it in the light of the social environment. In short, when answering such questions, we must not violate policy principles, but must also be reasonable, truthful and credible.

11. Response ideas for adaptability questions

During interviews, examiners often throw out surprising questions to test candidates' adaptability, mainly under stressful circumstances. Response to emergencies and difficult problems. Examinees are tested on their ability to quickly and dexterously change angles, adapt to circumstances, and draw parallels. Candidates must make correct judgments and actions quickly. Your thinking and response must be quick, your emotions must be stable, and you must consider problems thoughtfully. Candidates should follow the principle of "calm down first, remediate quickly, and then pursue responsibility", stay calm, calm down first, and then remedy the situation in a timely manner, propose a solution to the problem, or record and report the problem, or coordinate the resolution and supervision, and then report it to the superior. Reporting, accountability, etc. For example, the examiner asked what should the tour guide do if a tourist is found to have food poisoning? First of all, you should prevent other passengers from panicking and control their emotions; call the emergency hotline immediately, and while waiting, try to induce vomiting in the poisoned person, and let the poisoned person drink a lot of water to speed up excretion and alleviate the toxicity. Ask the hospital to issue a diagnosis certificate; report it quickly The travel agency will also hold the catering unit accountable.

There is also a resilience question. The questions are often directed at the content of the candidate's answer to the question. The questions are harsh. At this time, the candidate should control his emotions and tell himself that the examiner has no ill intentions and is just testing his emotions. Stability, self-control, responsiveness, adaptability, self-awareness, etc. For example, the examiner asked, from a psychological point of view, in order to leave a good impression on the examiner, candidates always try their best to show their strengths and cover up their shortcomings during the interview process. Do you also have this mentality now? Faced with this kind of pressure question, the examiner is more concerned about not what the candidate answered, but how to answer it. Candidates should note: First, do not be nervous or flustered, and do not think that your or others' interview performance was not satisfactory, so the examiner deliberately set questions to make things difficult for you, let alone think that "a catastrophe is imminent." Second, the answer must be sincere. Seek truth from facts and admit that no one is perfect, everyone has shortcomings and shortcomings, and everyone hopes to be praised. Therefore, during the interview process, it is understandable for candidates to make use of their strengths and avoid weaknesses, and even go for the examiner's favor.

Third, it is best to be witty and humorous in your answers. In this way, the examiner will think that the candidate is not only calm in all situations, but also has the ability to resolve pressure and tension.

12. Response ideas for planning, organization and coordination questions

This type of question has a fixed answer pattern, and the answer is generally divided into three stages: planning, implementation, and summary. According to the characteristics of the activity, determine the theme and content, formulate a budget based on the theme and content, and implement it after reporting. The implementation stage is divided into five parts. First, it is necessary to unify ideas through meetings, divide work, refine the plan and assign responsibilities to each personnel position. Second, sufficient supplies must be prepared, including people, money, materials, time, and place. Third, notify relevant participating departments. Fourth, arrangements for special events and requirements, such as coordinating participating units, leadership and guest support, and media public relations. Dynamics and special situations that arise during the activities must be handled and reported in a timely manner. Fifth, after the event, follow-up matters need to be carried out, such as material placement, document filing, symposium and other reports. Summary includes timely reporting, putting forward opinions, identifying gaps, modifying plans through symposiums and other forms, and writing a summary and submitting it to the leadership.

13. Ideas for answering questions on dealing with people and dealing with people

When answering the questions on dealing with people and dealing with skills raised by the examiner, you should use different ways to get along with different people. Towards superiors, one must have a respectful attitude and principle, obey the arrangements of superiors, know how to keep confidentiality, and do not talk about superiors, etc.; one must obey collective superiors, ask for instructions one-way without being humble or overbearing, maintain a neutral attitude, and do not talk nonsense, etc.; get along with colleagues in a reasonable and restrained manner, Be sincere and humble. When encountering conflicts, first look for your own shortcomings and deficiencies, use a third party to communicate and resolve conflicts, be tolerant of others, learn from each other's strengths, help each other, treat everyone equally, and do not form cliques. Help each other, treat colleagues' strengths and weaknesses, achievements and mistakes correctly, provide more help and encouragement, and seek common ground while reserving differences. In short, maintain a tolerant and equal attitude, do not discuss right and wrong, understand that no one is perfect, and no one is perfect, and treat the shortcomings and deficiencies of leaders, comrades, and themselves correctly.

14. Response ideas for analytical thinking ability questions

When answering such questions, you must maintain a dialectical way of thinking and always see the pros and cons of things. "If you have a principle, speak about it. If you need to express your stance, express your stance first." Use examples to clarify your views.

For example, if you ask a question, as the saying goes, many friends lead to many paths. What do you think of this? Considering the pros and cons of things, candidates should first clarify the general principle. Objectively speaking, the more friends the better. This actually reflects a person's communication skills and social activity abilities. But mutual help between friends is based on sincere communication, and only with the heart can the heart be exchanged. This is the positive part. On the other hand, there is no denying that some friends only exist out of interest. It is an emotional exchange under specific conditions and a conditional emotional investment. It cannot be regarded as a true friend, nor can it be regarded as a true friend. There will be no help and understanding from one party to the other in times of difficulty. Of course, the more friends, the better.

15. Ideas for answering speculative questions

Understand the meaning of the question; try your best to find the landing point and find the entry point; explain the two aspects of the question clearly from angles; Unify all aspects; connect yourself (avoid random connections).

16. Ideas for answering questions about understanding social phenomena

Explain the phenomenon reflected in the given words; treat this phenomenon dialectically: This phenomenon does exist, and in some cases It is still relatively serious in some areas and in some areas, but it is a local phenomenon. This sentence is only partial and comprehensive; it is pointed out that the harm of this phenomenon, although it is a local phenomenon, cannot be underestimated; it is pointed out that the root cause of this phenomenon is due to the lack of legal system. Perfect, the system is incomplete, supervision is not in place, and the quality is not improved; find a solution; be confident and put forward hope. Key points: social phenomena (undesirable, opposition, condemnation, objective existence, ugly, severe blow, indignation, pride,).

The routine is: first of all, this social phenomenon may exist, and then determine whether it is a local or overall problem. The overall situation is good and the mainstream is good. Only a very small number, extremely individual. The party and the country are working hard to solve these problems, and I myself have such an obligation; Core: Analyze whether the phenomenon is in line with the policies of the party and the country, social progress, judge whether it is good or bad and its causes and effects; Solution: Correct Treat it and take corresponding measures. Solving the occurrence of a phenomenon is not a short-term matter. It requires careful consideration, long-term planning, and preparation for long-term solutions.

Taboos in interviews

The biggest taboo in interviews: avoid speaking directly without thinking. (1) Urgent question about salary and remuneration.

Salary is an important aspect that candidates are concerned about. There is nothing wrong with discussing salary and remuneration. As long as the timing is correct, it is usually raised tactfully when both parties have preliminary intentions. However, if you rush into asking about salary when investing in stocks, it will have the opposite effect. (2) The answer to the question is illogical. When the examiner asks you to talk about your own failure experience, some candidates often answer that they have never failed in order to give the examiner a good impression. This is illogical. When the examiner asked what the advantages were, some candidates answered that I can do all jobs, which is even more unrealistic. Such an answer will make the examiner feel that the candidate is too conceited, and will conclude that the candidate is not suitable for the position being recruited. (3) Questions that put the cart before the horse. For example, at the end of an interview, the examiner asked the interviewer: Do you have any other questions for us? The interviewer asked: How big is your unit? What is the competition ratio? Candidates must put themselves in the right position when participating in the interview. An answer like this fully shows that they have not put their own position in the correct position. The questions raised have exceeded the scope of the questions that should be asked, which makes the examiner feel disgusted.

The second biggest taboo in interviews:

Avoid bad habits during the interview process. During the interview, some interviewees ruined their own image due to some informalities, which greatly reduced the effect of the interview or even failed. The main daily habits that should be paid attention to during the interview are:

(1) Hands. This part is most prone to problems. For example, the hands are always unsteady and busy, making some actions such as playing with the tie, picking the nose, caressing the fight, cracking the joints, playing with the business card handed over by the examiner, etc.

(2) Feet. Common movements of the feet include: nervous shaking, stretching forward, tilting, etc. These small actions not only artificially create tension, but also seem absent-minded and quite impolite.

(3) Back. He hunched his waist and arched his back, forming a modern version of "Liu Luo Guo". How can such a sitting posture make the examiner have confidence in you?

(4) Eyes. Or panic. He or she may be evasive or evasive, but when he or she should look squarely, his gaze is wandering, giving the impression that he lacks self-confidence or is hiding ulterior secrets, which may easily offend the examiner; in addition, staring intently at the examiner will inevitably give people a sense of oppression and lead to dissatisfaction. The face may be dull and rigid, or it may be cold and lifeless. How can such a zombie-like expression impress people? Remember, a lively and attractive face is important.

In short, you must get rid of these bad habits during interviews, and maintain a polite, neither humble nor arrogant, generous, decent, lively manner of speaking from beginning to end. Not only can this greatly enhance your own image, but it often greatly increases your chances of success.

The third taboo in interviews:

Avoid bad attitudes during the interview process. Anyone who participates in an interview, regardless of your quality or level, must not forget that you are accepting the selection of the employer. You should pay attention to the following attitudes:

(1) Avoid being arrogant and arrogant.

Some interviewees are among the best in the written test and have superior conditions in all aspects, so they are arrogant and arrogant. During the interview, he was arrogant and spoke aggressively. First, when the examiner is not satisfied with his answers or gives good guidance, he often makes excuses, tries hard to quibble, and refuses to admit his mistakes; second, he always wants to take the initiative in the interview and often asks the examiner some questions that have nothing to do with the interview content, such as What are the housing conditions of the employer? What kind of position will you hold? It seems that the employer has decided to hire him or her; third, when asked about the work situation of the original unit, he cannot keep calm, often belittles the leadership and work of the original unit, and denies others. results. Because excessively belittling the work of the leader of your original unit during the interview will make people think that you are unruly, like to talk about others behind their backs, and have a poor cooperative spirit.

(2) Avoid self-admiration and indifferent attitude

Some interviewees are usually withdrawn, indifferent to others, and have serious concerns, and they bring this personality into the interview room. During the interview, he had a cold expression, was unable to actively cooperate with the examiner, and lacked the necessary enthusiasm and intimacy. Little do you know that the leaders of all employers hope that their staff can live in harmony, be kind to others, unite and help each other, and make people feel relaxed and happy at work, so as to improve work efficiency. Even if the candidate is usually withdrawn, he must overcome this during the interview process. Otherwise, the atmosphere will be dull and the answers will be mechanical and dull. In this way, it is difficult to say that you have any hope of being selected.

The fourth taboo in interviews:

Avoid poor performance during the interview process. There are many kinds of bad performances. Here I only list some easy and common bad performances for candidates’ reference:

(1) Not good at breaking silence. At the beginning of the interview, the interviewer is not good at breaking the silence and waits for the interviewer to start talking. During the interview, the interviewer was unwilling to take the initiative to speak due to various concerns, which resulted in a cold start in the interview. Even if he could barely break the silence, his voice and intonation were extremely stiff, making the scene even more embarrassing. In fact, whether before or during the interview, the interviewer takes the initiative to greet and chat, which will leave a good impression on the interviewer that he is enthusiastic and good at talking.

(2) Avoid insufficient preparation. No matter how highly educated you are, how experienced you are, or how rich your work experience is, when the interviewer discovers that the applicant does not know much about the position you are applying for, and cannot even answer the most basic questions well, your impression score will naturally be greatly reduced. Not only will the interviewer feel that the candidate is underprepared, they may even think that they have no ambition to develop in this area. Therefore, you should be fully prepared before the interview