Unauthorized use of Bruce Lee's real kung fu can be said to be a violation of his right to portrait and dignity, because when it comes to real kung fu, everyone can think of Bruce Lee, and most people think that the trademark cartoon character is Bruce Lee, so they think that they are legally authorized. Before that, people always thought that the company was authorized, but now unauthorized use constitutes substantive infringement. Moreover, the unauthorized use of Kung Fu has a lot to do with Bruce Lee's image in the process of trademark setting and use, but they did not contact Bruce Lee's company, which is inappropriate.
The trademark infringement of this cartoon image is actually very complicated, because they don't directly quote his own portrait, but set it as a cartoon image and then registered it for many years. So it's not easy to judge directly, but the cartoon image using it has also caused great adverse effects on my life. If they use these to do other bad things or bad things, it will have more influence on the image of Bruce Lee in people's minds.
Although the judgment of trademark infringement of Kung Fu has not been executed, in Bian Xiao's view, there is corresponding infringement, because people often think that Bruce Lee himself endorsed it. This violated his portrait right, and now there are more than 600 stores in Kungfu all over the country, and it is increasing instead of decreasing. Coupled with the problem of trademark infringement, this has constituted a very serious infringement. If it is not controlled in time, people will use such loopholes to make more infringements in the future, resulting in a bad social atmosphere.