Supplement to the question: In September 2010, Zhao, a contractor of Baoxin Pharmacy in City A, purchased a batch of nutritional supplements with the "Chinese Super League" brand logo printed on them from individual vendors in the Qiying Town Market in the city. Stomach pills. Then it was shipped to City B, where Baoxin Pharmacy distributed it to six shopping malls and pharmaceutical companies in the city. After the above-mentioned unit purchased the "Zhongchao" brand Yangwei Pills, they immediately distributed this batch of Weiwei Pills through transportation, wholesale and retail, resulting in 15 pharmacies in the city. During the sales process, a pharmaceutical production and supply company in City B learned that consumers reported that the Wei Yangwei Pills did not have a strong medicinal taste. In December of the same year, they sent quality inspectors to conduct an inspection and confirmed that the quality of the "Chinese Super League" brand Yangwei Pills was indeed poor. They notified their departments to stop sales and return goods as soon as possible. On February 6, 2011, the registered trademark owner of the Yangwei Pills, a traditional Chinese medicine pharmaceutical factory, complained to the Shijiazhuang Industrial and Commercial Bureau and the Municipal Health Bureau respectively, requesting that the case of counterfeit Yangwei Pills sold by municipal pharmaceutical units be investigated and dealt with according to law. The Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce made the following decisions on this case in accordance with the Drug Administration Law on March 10, 2011: (1) Destroy all 412 boxes of counterfeit Yangwei Pills that have been sealed in Baoxin Pharmacy; (2) Consumers All returned goods were destroyed; (3) The illegal profits of Baoxin Pharmacy and 15 other pharmacies were confiscated and each was fined 2,000 yuan. Question:

(1) Which agencies have jurisdiction over this punishment case?

(2) Is the penalty decision made by the Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau legal? Why?

(3) If the Municipal Health Bureau also punishes this case in accordance with the "Drug Administration Law", does it violate the principle of "no punishment for the same matter"? Why?

(4) After investigation, it was found that the Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau made the above-mentioned penalty decision through a simple procedure. When making the penalty decision, it was originally planned to impose a fine of 1,500 yuan. However, due to Kangqiao Pharmacy’s continuous defense, it was later decided to fine 2,000 yuan. Yuan. From a procedural point of view, is the above approach of the Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau legal? Why? (1) Health Bureau, Public Security Bureau, Industry and Commerce Bureau, etc., (2) Illegal because it infringes on consumer rights. (3) No, because the Drug Administration Law stipulates this. (4) Illegal, because this is an act of not allowing the pharmacy to defend itself, and it is illegal.

Supplement to the question: In September 2010, Zhao, a contractor of Baoxin Pharmacy in City A, purchased a batch of nutritional supplements with the "Chinese Super League" brand logo printed on them from individual vendors in the market of Qiying Town in the city. Stomach pills. Then it was shipped to City B, where Baoxin Pharmacy distributed it to six shopping malls and pharmaceutical companies in the city. After the above-mentioned unit purchased the "Zhongchao" brand Yangwei Pills, they immediately distributed this batch of Weiwei Pills through transportation, wholesale and retail, resulting in 15 pharmacies in the city. During the sales process, a pharmaceutical production and supply company in City B learned that consumers reported that the Wei Yangwei Pills did not have a strong medicinal taste. In December of the same year, they sent quality inspectors to conduct an inspection and confirmed that the quality of the "Chinese Super League" brand Yangwei Pills was indeed poor. He notified his department to stop sales and return goods as soon as possible. On February 6, 2011, the registered trademark owner of the Yangwei Pills, a traditional Chinese medicine pharmaceutical factory, complained to the Shijiazhuang Industrial and Commercial Bureau and the Municipal Health Bureau respectively, requesting that the case of counterfeit Yangwei Pills sold by municipal pharmaceutical units be investigated and dealt with according to law. The Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce made the following decisions on this case in accordance with the Drug Administration Law on March 10, 2011: (1) Destroy all 412 boxes of counterfeit Yangwei Pills that have been sealed in Baoxin Pharmacy; (2) Consumers All returned goods were destroyed; (3) The illegal profits of Baoxin Pharmacy and 15 other pharmacies were confiscated and each was fined 2,000 yuan. ?Question: (1) Which agencies have jurisdiction over this punishment case? (2) Is the penalty decision made by the Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau legal? Why? (3) If the Municipal Health Bureau also punishes this case in accordance with the "Drug Administration Law", does it violate the principle of "no penalty again"? Why? (4) After investigation, it was found that the Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce made the above-mentioned penalty decision in a simplified procedure. When making the penalty decision, it originally planned to impose a fine of 1,500 yuan. However, due to Kangqiao Pharmacy’s continuous defense, it later decided to impose a fine of 2,000 yuan. From a procedural point of view, is the above approach of the Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau legal? Why? (1) Health Bureau, Public Security Bureau, Industry and Commerce Bureau, etc., (2) Illegal because it infringes on consumer rights. (3) No, because the Drug Administration Law stipulates this. (4) Illegal, because this is an act of not allowing the pharmacy to defend itself, which is illegal.

Supplement to the question: In September 2010, Zhao, a contractor of Baoxin Pharmacy in City A, purchased a batch of nutritional supplements with the "Chinese Super League" brand logo printed on them from individual vendors in the Qiying Town Market in the city. Stomach pills. Then it was shipped to City B, where Baoxin Pharmacy distributed it to six shopping malls and pharmaceutical companies in the city.

After the above-mentioned unit purchased the "Zhongchao" brand Yangwei Pills, they immediately distributed this batch of Weiwei Pills through transportation, wholesale and retail, resulting in 15 pharmacies in the city. During the sales process, a pharmaceutical production and supply company in City B learned that consumers reported that the Weiyangwei Pills did not have a strong medicinal taste. In December of the same year, they sent quality inspectors to conduct an inspection and confirmed that the quality of the "Chinese Super League" brand Yangwei Pills was indeed poor. They notified their departments to stop sales and return goods as soon as possible. On February 6, 2011, the registered trademark owner of the Yangwei Pills, a traditional Chinese medicine pharmaceutical factory, complained to the Shijiazhuang Industrial and Commercial Bureau and the Municipal Health Bureau respectively, requesting that the case of counterfeit Yangwei Pills sold by municipal pharmaceutical units be investigated and dealt with according to law. The Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce made the following decisions on this case in accordance with the Drug Administration Law on March 10, 2011: (1) Destroy all 412 boxes of counterfeit Yangwei Pills that have been sealed in Baoxin Pharmacy; (2) Consumers All returned goods were destroyed; (3) The illegal profits of Baoxin Pharmacy and 15 other pharmacies were confiscated and each was fined 2,000 yuan. ?Question: (1) Which agencies have jurisdiction over this punishment case? (2) Is the penalty decision made by the Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau legal? Why? (3) If the Municipal Health Bureau also punishes this case in accordance with the "Drug Administration Law", does it violate the principle of "no penalty again"? Why? (4) After investigation, the Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce made the above-mentioned penalty decision through a simplified procedure. When making the penalty decision, it originally planned to impose a fine of 1,500 yuan. However, due to Kangqiao Pharmacy’s continuous defense, it was later decided to impose a fine of 2,000 yuan. From a procedural point of view, is the above approach of the Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau legal? Why? (1) Health Bureau, Public Security Bureau, Industry and Commerce Bureau, etc., (2) Illegal because it infringes on consumer rights. (3) No, because the Drug Administration Law stipulates this. (4) Illegal, because this is an act of not allowing the pharmacy to defend itself, and it is illegal.

Supplement to the question: In September 2010, Zhao, a contractor of Baoxin Pharmacy in City A, purchased a batch of nutritional supplements with the "Chinese Super League" brand logo printed on them from individual vendors in the Qiying Town Market in the city. Stomach pills. Then it was shipped to City B, where Baoxin Pharmacy distributed it to six shopping malls and pharmaceutical companies in the city. After the above-mentioned unit purchased the "Zhongchao" brand Yangwei Pills, they immediately distributed this batch of Weiwei Pills through transportation, wholesale and retail, resulting in 15 pharmacies in the city. During the sales process, a pharmaceutical production and supply company in City B learned that consumers reported that the Weiyangwei Pills did not have a strong medicinal taste. In December of the same year, they sent quality inspectors to conduct an inspection and confirmed that the quality of the "Chinese Super League" brand Yangwei Pills was indeed poor. He notified his department to stop sales and return goods as soon as possible. On February 6, 2011, the registered trademark owner of the Yangwei Pills, a traditional Chinese medicine pharmaceutical factory, complained to the Shijiazhuang Industrial and Commercial Bureau and the Municipal Health Bureau respectively, requesting that the case of counterfeit Yangwei Pills sold by municipal pharmaceutical units be investigated and dealt with according to law. The Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce made the following decisions on this case in accordance with the Drug Administration Law on March 10, 2011: (1) Destroy all 412 boxes of counterfeit Yangwei Pills that have been sealed in Baoxin Pharmacy; (2) Consumers All returned goods were destroyed; (3) The illegal profits of Baoxin Pharmacy and 15 other pharmacies were confiscated and each was fined 2,000 yuan. ?Question: (1) Which agencies have jurisdiction over this punishment case? (2) Is the penalty decision made by the Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau legal? Why? (3) If the Municipal Health Bureau also punishes this case in accordance with the "Drug Administration Law", does it violate the principle of "no penalty again"? Why? (4) After investigation, the Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce made the above-mentioned penalty decision through a simplified procedure. When making the penalty decision, it originally planned to impose a fine of 1,500 yuan. However, due to Kangqiao Pharmacy’s continuous defense, it was later decided to impose a fine of 2,000 yuan. From a procedural point of view, is the above approach of the Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau legal? Why? (1) Health Bureau, Public Security Bureau, Industry and Commerce Bureau, etc., (2) Illegal because it infringes on consumer rights. (3) No, because the Drug Administration Law stipulates this. (4) Illegal, because this is an act of not allowing the pharmacy to defend itself, and it is illegal. Adopt it!

Supplement to the question: In September 2010, Zhao, a contractor of Baoxin Pharmacy in City A, purchased a batch of nutritional supplements with the "Chinese Super League" brand logo printed on them from individual vendors in the market of Qiying Town in the city. Stomach pills. Then it was shipped to City B, where Baoxin Pharmacy distributed it to six shopping malls and pharmaceutical companies in the city. After the above-mentioned unit purchased the "Zhongchao" brand Yangwei Pills, they immediately distributed this batch of Weiwei Pills through transportation, wholesale and retail, resulting in 15 pharmacies in the city.

During the sales process, a pharmaceutical production and supply company in City B learned that consumers reported that the Wei Yangwei Pills did not have a strong medicinal taste. In December of the same year, they sent quality inspectors to conduct an inspection and confirmed that the quality of the "Chinese Super League" brand Yangwei Pills was indeed poor. They notified their departments to stop sales and return goods as soon as possible. On February 6, 2011, the registered trademark owner of the Yangwei Pills, a traditional Chinese medicine pharmaceutical factory, complained to the Shijiazhuang Industrial and Commercial Bureau and the Municipal Health Bureau respectively, requesting that the case of counterfeit Yangwei Pills sold by municipal pharmaceutical units be investigated and dealt with according to law. The Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce made the following decisions on this case in accordance with the Drug Administration Law on March 10, 2011: (1) Destroy all 412 boxes of counterfeit Yangwei Pills that have been sealed in Baoxin Pharmacy; (2) Consumers All returned goods were destroyed; (3) The illegal profits of Baoxin Pharmacy and 15 other pharmacies were confiscated and each was fined 2,000 yuan. ?Question: (1) Which agencies have jurisdiction over this punishment case? (2) Is the penalty decision made by the Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau legal? Why? (3) If the Municipal Health Bureau also punishes this case in accordance with the "Drug Administration Law", does it violate the principle of "no punishment for the same matter"? Why? (4) After investigation, the Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce made the above-mentioned penalty decision through a simplified procedure. When making the penalty decision, it originally planned to impose a fine of 1,500 yuan. However, due to Kangqiao Pharmacy’s continuous defense, it was later decided to impose a fine of 2,000 yuan. From a procedural point of view, is the above approach of the Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau legal? Why? (1) Health Bureau, Public Security Bureau, Industry and Commerce Bureau, etc., (2) Illegal because it infringes on consumer rights. (3) No, because the Drug Administration Law stipulates this. (4) Illegal, because this is an act of not allowing the pharmacy to defend itself, and it is illegal. Adopt it!

Supplement to the question: In September 2010, Zhao, a contractor of Baoxin Pharmacy in City A, purchased a batch of nutritional supplements with the "Chinese Super League" brand logo printed on them from individual vendors in the Qiying Town Market in the city. Stomach pills. Then it was shipped to City B, where Baoxin Pharmacy distributed it to six shopping malls and pharmaceutical companies in the city. After the above-mentioned unit purchased the "Zhongchao" brand Yangwei Pills, they immediately distributed this batch of Weiwei Pills through transportation, wholesale and retail, resulting in 15 pharmacies in the city. During the sales process, a pharmaceutical production and supply company in City B learned that consumers reported that the Wei Yangwei Pills did not have a strong medicinal taste. In December of the same year, they sent quality inspectors to conduct an inspection and confirmed that the quality of the "Chinese Super League" brand Yangwei Pills was indeed poor. They notified their departments to stop sales and return goods as soon as possible. On February 6, 2011, the registered trademark owner of the Yangwei Pills, a traditional Chinese medicine pharmaceutical factory, complained to the Shijiazhuang Industrial and Commercial Bureau and the Municipal Health Bureau respectively, requesting that the case of counterfeit Yangwei Pills sold by municipal pharmaceutical units be investigated and dealt with according to law. The Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce made the following decisions on this case in accordance with the Drug Administration Law on March 10, 2011: (1) Destroy all 412 boxes of counterfeit Yangwei Pills that have been sealed in Baoxin Pharmacy; (2) Consumers All returned goods were destroyed; (3) The illegal profits of Baoxin Pharmacy and 15 other pharmacies were confiscated and each was fined 2,000 yuan. ?Question: (1) Which agencies have jurisdiction over this punishment case? (2) Is the penalty decision made by the Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau legal? Why? (3) If the Municipal Health Bureau also punishes this case in accordance with the "Drug Administration Law", does it violate the principle of "no penalty again"? Why? (4) After investigation, the Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce made the above-mentioned penalty decision through a simplified procedure. When making the penalty decision, it originally planned to impose a fine of 1,500 yuan. However, due to Kangqiao Pharmacy’s continuous defense, it was later decided to impose a fine of 2,000 yuan. From a procedural point of view, is the above approach of the Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau legal? Why? (1) Health Bureau, Public Security Bureau, Industry and Commerce Bureau, etc., (2) Illegal because it infringes on consumer rights. (3) No, because the Drug Administration Law stipulates this. (4) Illegal, because this is an act of not allowing the pharmacy to defend itself, and it is illegal. Adopt it!