I copied this from the Internet. Please read it carefully!

Recently, the battle between Ke Mi and Ke Hei on the Internet has been fierce. The two sides are going back and forth, and it is very lively. I have been watching the fire from afar and will not make any comments. But since Kobe scored 81 points, some fans have clamored that Kobe has surpassed Jordan and established the Kobe era. I finally couldn't help but want to say a few words about this.

I started watching the NBA in the late 1980s when the Pistons competed with the Lakers for the championship. It’s been 16 or 17 years now, and I consider myself an old fan. I have accompanied the league through several dynasties, and I have also entered my thirties. I have long outgrown the age of worshiping idols, so now I am neither a black man nor a honey. I just watch the players with my deep love for the NBA. , watch the game, watch the entire league.

Speaking of Kobe, we cannot fail to mention his 81 points. I have always liked Kobe because of his skills and his perseverance. After that game, I only had one feeling in my heart: amazing! Because this is definitely an important moment that will go down in history! If Jordan was possessed by God during his game against the Cavaliers in 1990, then the devil undoubtedly appeared when Kobe Bryant played against the Raptors. The reason is very simple. Information checked after the game by "Hoops.com", a well-known American basketball media, shows that the game in which Kobe scored 81 points happened to be the 666th regular season game in his career, and the number 666 in the West It symbolizes the devil Satan who always likes to fight against God. Since then, people have to admire Kobe's talent and desire to win; since then, people have to admit (even if some people don't admit it) that Kobe's offensive ability is not inferior to his predecessors.

Kobe is indeed too good, so I like Kobe very much and like to watch his games.

But, I finally have to say "but":

I can't stand the arrogance of some Kobe fans. For example, they actually say that even Jordan is not as good as Kobe. Here, I would like to do a survey by the way: Commies who said these things, when did you start watching football? Do you know Jordan?

Measuring a player depends on his overall quality. For example, Carter's offense is absolutely top-notch, but his defense is useless, so he is not yet at the top level. Of course, the comprehensive quality mentioned here not only refers to offensive and defensive abilities, but also includes stability, psychological quality, leadership skills, leadership temperament, influence, etc. If we only look at the scoring ability one-sidedly, then the fans might as well worship Kareem Abdul-Jabbar and Chamberlain, who are number one in total scoring and number one in scoring in a single game.

I am not keen on comparing players with each other, but since some fans insist that Kobe has surpassed Jordan, then you can read on:

Look at him first The average statistics of the two careers:

Three-pointers, free throws, points, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, errors and fouls

Jordan’s regular season 49.7 32.7 83.5 30.1 6.3 5.3 2.35 0.83 2.73 2.6

Playoffs 48.7 33.2 82.8 33.4 6.4 5.7 2.1 0.88 3.05 3

Kobe Bryant regular season 45.1 33.6 83.4 23.9 5.14.5 1.5 0.61 2.87 2.7

Playoffs 43.4 32.3 79. 2 22.6 4.8 4.4 1.35 0.75 2.68 3.16

This includes Jordan's two years with the Wizards and the 2005-06 season when Kobe won the scoring title. If he hadn't played with the Wizards for another two years late in his career, Jordan's statistics would have been even higher. As for Kobe, no matter in terms of age, body, consciousness, technology, psychology, etc., he is now at his peak with ten years of professional playing experience, so this comparison is still in favor of Kobe. But even so, we can still see that Kobe's data lags behind Jordan in all aspects, and the difference is at least one level. I don’t need to say more here. The data is here. Facts speak louder than words.

Many Kobe fans always say: Kobe's 3-pointers are much better than Jordan's. But from the data point of view, they seem to be at the same level in 3-pointers, but I want to remind you: in the first four seasons of his career, Jordan's 3-point shooting rate was only more than ten percent, which was simply amateur. level, but the average data in all seasons is almost the same as Kobe's, and even the data in the playoffs, which is a more test of kung fu, is higher than Kobe's. This shows that Jordan's 3-pointers were better than Kobe's later. Another important point: Jordan's statistics in the playoffs are always higher than those in the regular season, while Kobe's numbers are exactly the opposite. What can those fans who think Kobe's personal ability is higher than Jordan's say?

Many Komies always say: Jordan has so many helpers around him, including the best small forward, rebounding leader, and best sixth man, but Kobe has nothing around him. It seems that you have only seen Jordan after 1996 at most. Let’s look at another set of data:

Three-point shots, free throws, rebounds, assists, steals and blocks

Jordan’s 87-88 season 53.5 13.2 84.1 35 5.5 5.9 3.16 1.6

Kobe Bryant's 05-06 season 45 34.7 85 35.4 5.3 4.5 1.84 0.38

Kobe won the scoring title, averaging 35.4 points per game. Not mentioning the season when Jordan averaged 37.1 points per game, let's compare Jordan's data from the 1987-88 season when he also averaged 35 points per game. At that time, Jordan had no helpers around him. You see, Kobe's poor performance lies in his shooting percentage and defense. Everyone knows: When Kobe is in good form, he is like a god, and can score any goal. But when he is in downturn, he is ignored by everyone. That is to say, his stability is not very reliable, and Kobe's high score is due to the high number of shots he takes. . With the same score, the field goal percentage was 8.5 percentage points lower. That means Kobe took about 7 more shots per game than Jordan. What does that mean? First, Kobe's accuracy, stability and efficiency are not as good as Jordan's; second, the 7 shot opportunities saved by Jordan can help his teammates score more, that is, when the two score the same number, Jordan's teammate scores more, that is, Jordan leads the team to score more points. The team's performance is better, but Kobe is not as good as Jordan in terms of leadership ability. In addition, Kobe's steals and blocks are far different from Jordan's. His rebounding ability is similar, but his assists are not at the same level. In such a brilliant season, Kobe is still far behind Jordan. Let’s look at Jordan’s most comprehensive season statistics (88-89): averaging 32.5 points, 8 rebounds, 8 assists, 2.9 steals and 0.8 blocks per game. Is Kobe ashamed? O'Neal once said: "Even my grandma can win a championship when she plays with Jordan." Aopang has always been proud, and he is not someone who likes to praise others.

Kobe's defense is good, and quite good, but there is still a big gap between him and Jordan. This can also be seen from the previous data. So Jordan won 3 steals, 1 Defensive Player of the Year, and was selected to the All-Defensive First Team of the Year 9 times. Compared with these, Kobe is nowhere to be seen.

Some Komie said: In the past, the NBA used man-to-man defense, but now it allows zone defense, making it more difficult to attack. Therefore, it is more difficult for Kobe to average 30 points per game than his predecessors. This view seems to be recognized by all the fans. Having said this, I can't help but want to ask: Comedies, why do you say that the NBA's defense is stronger now than in the past? How much do you know about the history of the NBA?

Let’s talk about marking and zone defense first. These are two different defensive methods. Man-to-man defense has strong variability, including defensive area and personnel. It is characterized by a clear division of labor. It has better defensive effects for players with higher outside ability and teams with good outside shooting ability, but it requires high abilities and physical strength of the defensive players; The characteristic of zone defense is that it has better control of the inside line, but there are also situations where it is easy for the opponent to overwhelm the opponent and there are defensive blind spots. First of all, they have a complementary relationship. No tactical expert will say which one is better, because the opponent is changing, the opponent's tactics are changing, and even one's own personnel and tactics are changing. Also, there is a difference between NBA zone defense and FIBA ??zone defense.

FIBA mostly uses a 2-1-2 position, which is relatively balanced between offense and defense. When the inside pressure is high, a 3-2 zone defense will be used, and even the big men can pile up to the basket. The NBA is different. First of all, the NBA's 3-point area (defensive area) is much larger than FIBA, so the effect of zone defense will definitely be compromised. Furthermore, the NBA has a 3-second defense, so the NBA mostly uses 2-2- when playing zone defense. 1 position, the big men can't always wait for work under the basket, which is conducive to offense. There are many tactics to break zone defenses, and players with strong personal abilities such as Kobe, McGrady, Ai, Wade, James, Dirk, Pierce, etc. are all powerful tools for breaking zone defenses. Which team like these doesn't send someone to guard them when they play against them? Wasn't there a "Kobe Terminator" in the league? That's the result of man-to-man marking, not zone defense!

Also, I think the defensive strength of the league is not as strong as it used to be. This is a conclusion I reached after combining the games I watched in the late 1980s and 1990s and now. The league currently promotes offense, and the average points per game during the season has also increased than before. In particular, some teams represented by the Suns, Mavericks, Nuggets, Nets, etc. play offensive basketball and advocate "playing a whirlwind quickly" . In games between these teams, both sides often score high because the offensive and defensive rhythms have become faster, but while they score high, they also lose a lot of points. Their basketball philosophy can be understood to be that they would rather be beaten than hit others. They should use offense to suppress the opponent's offense, and they do not focus on defense. The Spurs have always played defense, and in recent years they have also started to attack quickly. Parker and Manu are masters in this area, but they can no longer see the airtight defense they used to have. New York, Indiana, and Miami have always been examples of defensive teams. The style has also changed, but Detroit is still sticking to its previous defensive style. Not just these teams, but the style of the entire league is changing. Because the league wants to develop the market, attract more fans, especially young fans, and expand its influence, it has revised the rules in recent years, advocated offense, improved viewing, and Make stars and more. So don’t just look at the introduction of zone defense in the league and naively think that the defense is stronger than before.

The NBA paid great attention to defense from the late 1980s to the 1990s (especially the entire 1990s), and the concept of defense was far beyond what it can be today. That's why Jordan said he relies on defense to win championships. Now the league promotes offense, and some of the revised rules are conducive to offense. For example, if the defender needs to block shots, his body cannot come into contact with the offensive player's body, otherwise a defensive foul will be called. This is very conducive to someone like Kobe who is good at it. Breakthrough player. But in the past, for example, when Jordan made a layup, which one on the defensive side was not forceful? How can we say that attacking is more difficult now than before? Commies who are saying this, have you ever seen the fierce fight between the black and white heroes on the field? Have you ever seen the Bad Boys using all possible means to stop Jordan? Have you seen how Dameng and Gorilla struggled under the basket? Have you seen the wrestling match between Malone and Rodman? Have you seen how New Yorkers created the miracle of Black Eight? I haven't seen this kind of defensive intensity in recent years.

Look at the status of Jordan and Kobe in the NBA in their respective periods. In the Jordan era, there were so many heroes: Big Bird, Magician, Smiling Assassin, Admiral, Big Dream, Postman, Ewing, Bad Guy, Glider, God's Left Hand, Rain Man, Glove, Miller... Who is right about Jordan? He doesn't follow his lead, so Jordan is called a god, God himself wearing the No. 23 jersey. What about Kobe? Fans call him the No. 1 player in the NBA, but do the players in the league think so? Do AI, Carter, McGrady, KG, Duncan and James think so? Does Ao Pang think so?

So don’t make blind comparisons without watching previous games and without understanding Jordan’s mental level at all, and just say whatever comes to your mind. Ask the old fans around you who have been watching football since the 1980s what they think, and see if they are like you think. Do you have such humility?

Kobe is indeed excellent and talented, so I like him too. But he's not at the level you're talking about yet.

To be honest, as a fan, I really hope that Kobe can surpass Jordan one day and bring us more excitement and shock, because what I want is a game, a wonderful game (I also want to remind Kobe Bryants here) : Don’t keep mentioning the old shit about rape cases. Are you watching the competition or the rape cases? ), but it has to be truly transcendent and not blown out by the Komi. Do you know how many Kehei are not Kehei at first, but became Kehei after seeing the arrogance of some Kemies?