Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark registration - Which is better for zero-speed hegemony?
Which is better for zero-speed hegemony?
Audi's zero-speed bullying has countless different evaluations because of its different appearance, so I won't say much here. There is no real thing, just compare the parameters announced by each car.

Eight attributes: speed, torque, grip, weight, strength, stability, flexibility and durability.

The priority of racing performance is speed and torque, which is closely related to racing performance. The calculation method is the product of torque and speed.

As for the given power attribute, you can only see the approximate capacity after calculation, which is not linear, so it is for reference only. Other attributes are weak, so I won't mention them here.

The first echelon "Shadow Warrior" and "Ice Hunter" have the same price, and one set of batteries is free, which is suitable for brainless play. However, the combined torque and speed of "Shadow Warrior" is higher than that of "Ice Hunter" 145, which is very close to the second echelon.

Three vehicles of the second echelon, namely "Ultrasonic Bullet", "Pulse New" and "Liuhuo", need to be equipped with batteries, but the combined values of torque and speed of these three vehicles are 154, while the combined values of torque and speed of "Split Flywheel" are only 136, which belongs to the level of the first echelon.

In the third echelon, the combined torque and speed values of Comet from the Thunderbolt, Soul Chaser and Triumphal Ares are 342, while those of Booming Sky Speed Wheel, Overseas Fei Ying and One-eyed Troll are between 320 and 330. It is worth noting that the official strength of the third echelon is around 18, which is relative to the 65438+ of the second echelon.

Pure original analysis, pure hand-beating, thank you.