According to the relevant provisions of my country’s Trademark Law and the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Legal Issues Concerning the Pre-litigation of Stopping Infringement of the Exclusive Rights of Registered Trademarks and the Preservation of Evidence, pre-litigation preservation of trademark infringement can be divided into There are two types of property preservation and evidence preservation: 1. Property preservation trademark registrants or interested parties have evidence to prove that others are committing or are about to commit acts that infringe on their registered trademark exclusive rights. If not stopped in time, their legitimate rights and interests will be affected. If the damage is irreparable, you can apply to the People's Court for property preservation measures before filing a lawsuit, but the applicant needs to provide a guarantee. If no guarantee is provided, the application will be rejected. Property preservation is limited to the scope of the request, or property related to the case, by sealing, detaining, freezing or other methods prescribed by law. After the people's court freezes property, it shall immediately notify the person whose property is frozen. If the property has been sealed or frozen, it shall not be seized or frozen again. After the people's court accepts the application, it must make a ruling within 48 hours; if it decides to take property preservation measures, it must start implementation immediately. If the applicant does not file a lawsuit within fifteen days after the people's court takes preservation measures, the people's court shall terminate the property preservation. If the respondent provides a guarantee, the People's Law shall also terminate the property preservation. If there is an error in the application, the applicant shall compensate the respondent for the losses suffered due to property preservation. If the party concerned is dissatisfied with the ruling on property preservation, he may apply for reconsideration once. The execution of the ruling will not be suspended during the review period. 2. Preservation of evidence In order to stop infringement, if the evidence may be lost or difficult to obtain in the future, the trademark registrant or interested party may, before filing a lawsuit, submit a request to the people who have jurisdiction over the trademark case at the place where the infringement occurred or where the respondent is domiciled. The court applied for preservation of evidence. Interested parties who file the application include the licensee of the trademark license contract and the legal successor of the property rights of the registered trademark. Among the licensees of a registered trademark license contract, the licensee of the exclusive license contract may apply to the People's Court separately; the licensee of the exclusive license contract may apply if the trademark registrant does not apply. When a trademark registrant or interested party applies to the People's Court for pre-litigation preservation of evidence, he or she shall submit a written application. The application form shall state: (1) the parties and their basic information; (2) the specific content, scope and location of the evidence requested for preservation; (3) the objects that can be proved by the evidence requested for preservation; (4) the reasons for the application, including A specific explanation that the evidence may be lost or difficult to obtain in the future, and the parties and their litigation representatives cannot collect it on their own due to objective reasons. If the applicant's application for pre-litigation preservation of evidence may involve property losses of the respondent, the People's Court may order the applicant to provide corresponding guarantee. If the applicant fails to provide guarantee, the application shall be rejected. If the trademark registrant or interested party does not file a lawsuit within fifteen days after the people's court takes measures to preserve evidence, the people's court shall terminate the measures taken. The people's court's ruling to stop infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark or to preserve evidence before litigation shall be limited to the scope of the trademark registrant or interested party's application.