With the improvement of China's film and television level, the audience has higher and higher requirements for film and television actors. The broadcast of the film "Nezha" has also been well received by all parties, causing great waves in the film and television circle. The total box office jumped to the second place in that year, second only to Wolf Warriors 2. However, a recent news caused a heated discussion among netizens. The film Nezha was accused of plagiarism, claiming 50 million yuan. At the same time, the plaintiff's logic is very unusual, and many netizens expressed incomprehension.

China Hua Teng Film and Television Culture Co., Ltd. accused the film Nezha of copying the stage play Five-dimensional Memory, which was copyrighted by their company. The stage play has been performed in Beijing, the United States and other places, claiming that Nezha is a character with exactly the same storyline and five-dimensional memory, and the company also claimed 50 million yuan from the film producer of The Magical Boy of Nezha. Nezha's influence is very high at present. Everyone can change the public resources of historical myths. Only when the interests are set and the ideas or characters are expressed, the story, design style and concept are the same, which will constitute infringement, which makes many netizens feel very shocked, because the company's behavior is also touching porcelain.

Many netizens stood on the side of the magical boy who came to the world, leaving messages in the comment area to support Nezha, because careful netizens found the registration of this stage play. Time is still behind The Birth of Pastime. Because of the confusion of time logic, did the stage play copy Nezha? Dare to ask for so much money, which not only wastes judicial resources, but also has a very bad influence on society.

At present, most netizens are supporting the plaintiff, but things are not over yet. We hope that the law can criticize fairly and give everyone an explanation. We should pay more attention to the development of deductive works than these trivial matters. As long as the works are good, their relationship has little to do with us.