Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark registration - How to judge "ignorance", "legal acquisition" and "explanation provider" in trademark infringement
How to judge "ignorance", "legal acquisition" and "explanation provider" in trademark infringement
Legal analysis: "I don't know" means that the seller didn't know that the product was a trademark infringement product when buying and selling. "Legal acquisition" can generally be identified by the seller providing transaction invoices, payment vouchers and other materials. "Description provider" is our common "confession and leniency" and "honest explanation", that is, the information provided by the seller on the source of the product can be verified by the relevant departments.

Legal basis: Article 67 of the Trademark Law of People's Republic of China (PRC).

Without the permission of the trademark registrant, if a trademark identical to its registered trademark is used on the same commodity, which constitutes a crime, criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law in addition to compensation for the losses of the infringed party.

Whoever, without authorization, forges or manufactures another person's registered trademark logo or sells a forged or manufactured registered trademark logo, which constitutes a crime, shall be investigated for criminal responsibility in accordance with the law, in addition to compensating the losses of the infringed party.

Whoever knowingly sells goods with counterfeit registered trademarks, which constitutes a crime, shall be investigated for criminal responsibility according to law, in addition to compensating the losses of the infringed.