The Japanese version of Vogue previously announced that kim kardashian was on the cover of the August issue. This is the first time that kim kardashian appeared in vogue magazine of Asian countries.

unfortunately, the cover of this book may not be really discounted. Recently, Kim Kardashian was suspected of insulting Japan, causing Japanese netizens to boycott. In this way, Kim Kardashian recently launched an underwear series, selling women's plastic underwear. These bras are close to the abdomen, with silicone pads on the chest and buttocks, creating a sexy figure as kim kardashian. For kim kardashian, it is wise to make money with her iconic figure, because her figure has really influenced the aesthetics of women in the new era. But she thinks she is smart enough to name her own brand with the word kimono shapewer, because there is her name kim in the kimono.

Unfortunately, kimono means "kimono" in English, which is completely different from underwear in kim kardashian. This also makes Japanese netizens very dissatisfied with Kim Kardashian's behavior and thinks that she does not know how to respect Japanese traditional culture. Because kimono is an elegant traditional dress in the hearts of Japanese people, it is neither tight nor exposed, but kim kardashian named these tight underwear at the same level, which made the Japanese think it was ironic for Japan.

Many Japanese netizens said: Kimono is a traditional costume that Japan has been wearing since the 15th century. For them, Kimono is a very important culture and is often worn on weddings, National Day and other big days.

kim kardashian registered the trademark of "kimono", bought the commercial right of this word, and defined this word as plastic underwear. With Kim Kardashian's influence on the Internet, Japanese netizens will appear a series of underwear in the search engine "kimono", instead of the kimono they are proud of. This incident is unacceptable to many Japanese netizens, because the word "kimono" belongs to Japan, not kim kardashian, who called it cultural theft.