Jagerhagureis is a fake wine.

The State Intellectual Property Office determined in the ruling: "The disputed trademark (i.e., No. 31027236 "Jagerha Gurez" trademark) designated products such as 'Soju; Liqueur' and the cited trademark ( That is to say, the goods such as 'Shochu; Liqueur' that Jagermeister Company previously registered (No. 5614224 'Jagermeister' trademark) were approved to be of the same or similar type, and the disputed trademark 'Jagerhaus Gurez' fully included the cited trademark 'Yegurt'. "Form", the two parties are similar in terms of word composition and pronunciation of the trademarks, forming similar marks. At the same time, on the same or similar goods mentioned above, it is easy for consumers to confuse the source of the goods.

Therefore, the dispute arises. The trademark and the cited trademark have constituted similar trademarks used on the same or similar goods? In accordance with Article 30 of the 2013 Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China, the 2019 Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China. "In accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 1, Paragraph 2 of Article 45 and Article 46, our office rules as follows: The disputed trademark shall be declared invalid."