I think it is unfair competition. What kind of behavior does this belong to? Rubbing hot? And I think Didi has the right to sue them. I remember in college, our teacher talked about trademark law, but similar names can be used, so there are so many pirated products with similar names, such as? Li Bai? Or? Can you order a coke? Wait, actually, if you look into it carefully. These pirated products can be prosecuted, but generally genuine brands will not take care of them. In other words, pirated brands are actually promoting genuine products, so genuine products are not specifically prosecuted.

The standard of prosecution I think that in many cases, genuine brands will not control piracy, but if this piracy is more popular than genuine brands, then genuine brands will definitely pay attention to the rights of this trademark. In fact, in our country, most people are not so clear about the concept of trademark law, which is why this happens. Dropping ball? Direct? Didi taxi? In fact, I think the mistake in this matter is not just the scratch of the ball by Didi. At the beginning, Didi taxi was just a software. Because Didi became popular, other products were derived. Because of these, Didi? It has become a special term for Didi taxi.

However, Didi taxis are also registered by themselves. If Didi taxi wants to open Didi taxi, then Didi taxi should also register these related names in advance.

The competition between Didi Chuxing and Didi Chuxing is well known to most people, and Didi Chuxing will also be defaulted as its affiliated software, so Didi Chuxing cannot open the channels of Didi Chuxing. Even if it is, users will mistakenly think that Didi Chuxing is the related software of Didi Chuxing.

In fact, this kind of behavior is still discouraged. In my opinion, brands can only enter thousands of households if they are made by themselves. This opportunistic way can only bring temporary benefits.