Legal analysis: There may be danger of personal information disclosure. Generally speaking, as long as the password is not revealed, the funds of the bank card will not be taken away. Without a valid certificate signed by me or a notarized entrustment certificate, it is impossible to withdraw money from the bank counter. However, criminals may forge their citizenship information and use bank accounts to engage in fraudulent credit card swiping and illegal online financial transactions.

Legal basis: Article 7 of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Civil Disputes over Bank Cards states that if the cardholder of a debit card requests the issuer to pay the principal and interest of the stolen deposit and compensate the losses based on the legal relationship of the debit card contract, the people's court shall support it according to law. In case of fraudulent credit card transaction or online credit card transaction, if the credit card holder requests the card issuer to return the deducted overdraft principal and interest, liquidated damages and compensation for losses based on the legal relationship of the credit card contract, the people's court shall support it according to law; If the issuing bank requests the credit card holder to repay overdraft principal and interest, liquidated damages, etc., the people's court will not support it. In the first two cases, if the cardholder is at fault for failing to properly keep identity information such as bank card, password and verification code and transaction verification information, and the issuing bank claims that the cardholder should bear corresponding responsibilities, the people's court shall support it. If the cardholder fails to take measures such as reporting the loss in time to prevent the loss from expanding, and the issuing bank claims that the cardholder should bear the responsibility for expanding the loss, the people's court shall support it.