Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Overdue credit card - A 12-year-old mentally retarded boy in Guangzhou rewarded an anchor RMB 30,000. Should the anchor return it?
A 12-year-old mentally retarded boy in Guangzhou rewarded an anchor RMB 30,000. Should the anchor return it?

? A 12-year-old mentally retarded boy in Guangzhou rewarded an anchor with 30,000 yuan, and the anchor should return it. In today's era, the trend of live broadcasting is gradually rising, creating anchors and becoming a new profession. Many platforms have online and offline contracts with anchor artists, and at the same time provide their artists with dedicated live broadcast venues and professional live broadcast equipment. They were trained and packaged. When the anchor artist is broadcasting live, favorite viewers, tourists, fans, etc. can send various gifts to the favorite anchor to show their talents or ask for so-called contact information. And now the registration method for live broadcast is very simple, just a mobile phone number and a verification code. Therefore, this has resulted in many minors using money, deposits, credit cards, etc. from their parents’ mobile phones to reward anchors.

1. From a legal perspective

my country's "General Principles of Civil Law" stipulates that minors over eight years old are persons with limited capacity for civil conduct, and their legal agents shall be responsible for the performance of civil legal acts. If the person acts as an agent or with the consent or ratification of his legal agent, he may independently carry out civil legal acts for purely profit-making or civil legal acts commensurate with his age and intelligence. Although this boy in Guangzhou is 12 years old, he has some problems with his brain that cannot be explained by ordinary people. After the boy has finished tipping, the anchor should discuss with the platform after understanding the situation and refund all the reward value.

2. From a moral perspective

This boy is only 12 years old and has some brain problems. His whole life is worse than ordinary people. And his parents will spend a lot of money and effort to raise him, take care of him and treat him. This 30,000 yuan was hard-earned. So from a moral perspective, the anchor should be considerate of his family. The anchor should discuss with the platform and refund all reward values.

After this incident, we should call on more parents to take care of their children and not let them know the payment password. Prevent minors who can bear the consequences from rewarding online anchors from the source.