When I encountered some difficult problems in school, work or even games, I was puzzled and scratched my head. Once I saw the answer, I would marvel at other people’s ideas. Why didn’t I think of it at the time? Woolen cloth? Why can I only think of these dimensions when answering questions?

Later I also read a lot of thinking training books, but they were all like trying to find the moon in a well. I could always see it but couldn’t figure it out. Many so-called masters listed many methods, such as horizontal, Vertical, systematic, time, space and other dimensions, but when it comes to practical problems, the use of these methods is not very effective. I later concluded that this is still due to insufficient experience and knowledge. Without this basis, it is useful to talk about methods. problematic.

? But methods and routines can stimulate my thinking, and the importance of this is beyond doubt. For example, this time on the inspection of credit cards, the same problem is solved. Supervision can investigate the internal management problems reflected by a bad account from multiple dimensions, such as income, credit limit, overdue limit, credit report, number of card issuers, social security , temporary transfer, transaction records. And I basically only thought about income, age, social security, etc. When I checked at the card center, I was so depressed that no problem could be found on the spot. Looking back now, I still feel nervous. If someone could give me these pointers at that time, I would suddenly understand that the winding path leads to a dark place.

The breakthrough ideas for inspection work are generally based on the places that have caused bad problems. However, when analyzing problems, experts have many dimensions, and sometimes I can only think of one or two. This is why Others can see a lot when looking at a problem, but I think everything is OK. Why do other people write articles that make them full of ideas, but you are so dry that you can't even hold them in for a long time?

The main thing is to start training from the breadth and depth. The breadth is to ask yourself which dimensions I have not paid attention to? Ask yourself deeply what is the reason behind this? Similar to Socrates’ questioning?

To check the work ideas, first understand the institutional arrangements, processes, operation processes, and personnel allocation. For manual operation, special attention should be paid to actual single-person operation. There have been too many cases of fraud in China, so we need to be sensitive and make bold guesses: could the information be fake? This is similar to a lawyer's thinking. Only evidence can dispel my doubts.

In the future, we still need to review and summarize more.