Because of this authorization loophole, some netizens questioned Alipay for deliberately reducing the font size to prevent users from paying attention to the authorized content. Therefore, many people did not discover this "Sesame Service Agreement" and may have signed this "agreement" unknowingly.

So for the Alipay annual bill, it was half-heated by the default check option. What I want to say here is that setting the font to such a small size and directly checking it by default is strictly Generally speaking, this method of operation is indeed inappropriate. For normal operation, the user should choose whether to authorize it. Only in this way can the user trust the property information for safekeeping.

Sesame Credit released a statement saying that "users check 'I agree to the Sesame Service Agreement' by default when checking their Alipay annual bills, saying that this matter must be wrong. The incident has brought everyone We deeply apologize to everyone for the panic and misunderstanding.

The statement stated that it originally hoped to fully respect the user’s right to know and let users know that Alipay’s annual bill will only be issued with their consent. It can show his credit-free content. The original intention is correct but it is used in the wrong way, which is extremely stupid.