You are good-looking. For the sake of being your senior, I will tell you about your problem. My views are as follows:

1. If you have the ability and want to study finance, Go to a better school;

I think the two majors of "Finance" or "Economics" are too broad. If you study hard for four years, you will become a "theorist" after you graduate, and the Physics Institute What will come out will be relatively low-level "theorists" who are not very practical. Think about it, who would ask a recent graduate to do financial analysis and study macroeconomics? But then again, if you come from Renmin University or Peking University, Everyone will rush to get you...

2. Two directions of materials are preferable, one is logistics, and the other is accounting.

The former’s property management score in logistics management and logistics engineering is slightly higher. You get what you pay for. If you like the logistics exam, the property management course in the Institute of Physics (the same tongue twister) is a good choice. Logistics engineering is also good. Well, after all, they both went to the same place when they were employed. Those who are involved in logistics such as Ocean Ocean, China Railway, Fanke, etc. all recognize the School of Materials and Materials; the accounting of the latter is divided into two directions: accounting and capital injection. The two are roughly the same. There is no difference, the scores are about the same as logistics, and the employment is good (there is no need for accounting).

3. The financial (futures) direction of the Institute of Finance and Economics

It was also very famous in the past, because many people who played futures in the past came from the material side, but now I feel that it is average and the scores belong to the physical side. As the name suggests, there are many people who go to securities companies to engage in securities, futures, funds, etc. after graduation. If you like these, you can still consider applying.