There is no standard answer to this question. Some people think that Taobao's non-supply mode is better, while others think that Pinduoduo's non-supply mode is better. Since last year, many people have done JD.COM. Non-supply mode of COM. In fact, on the one hand, it is related to the overall environment, on the other hand, it is related to your own resources and operational capabilities. Let's analyze it from several angles.

1, objective environment: What I am talking about here is that the traffic dividend period is generally in the early stage of the platform, that is, the platform is still expanding and there is no profit plan. At this time, many rules and regulations of the platform are not perfect, and you can only do it by extensive operation, such as the non-supply mode in Pinduoduo now, but the non-supply mode in Taobao and JD.COM has entered the refined operation mode, which requires high capital and operation.

2. Own resources and advantages: If the flow dividend period has passed, then Taobao and JD.COM can't do the model of no supply? I don't think so. It depends on your own advantages and the resources you have. Some people have the advantage of supply channels around them and can get very low prices. Or the e-commerce operation ability is super strong and so on. Therefore, for friends who master these advantages, they will feel that Taobao has no supply or even JD.COM has no supply, because the profit may be higher.