So among these 3,000 W people, only 1.2w, that is, four ten thousandths of the shareholders, really made a fortune in the stock market. Therefore, it can be said that only 4 out of 10,000 investors have really made a fortune. It doesn't matter. You'd say there are others who have made millions or tens of millions. Can't they be considered rich? The stock market is basically a casino, no matter at home or abroad. There are two kinds of people in the casino, one is the winner and the other is the loser. The winner will only win all the time, the loser will eventually lose, and most of the one-time winners can only be classified as losers. Why? Because casinos don't make money by drugs, but by time. The winner is 99% people who have been hanging out in casinos. A few percent of these 99% people will win money temporarily, but time will make him hand over all his chips. So only these four people can really make money in the stock market.
And how many of the shareholders of this 1W know that technology and technology are good, not to mention how many, 99% of them are definitely losing money, and 99% of them can definitely say that quite a few people have a certain understanding of the current theory and technology, and even a few technologies are not bad. But these 99% people are also technically negligible. It still depends on 1% people. That is, the remaining 100. Of this 100, 35 were earned by luck and long-held innocence. Earn pure money because the entry position is very low and the holding time is quite long, which has nothing to do with technology. The remaining 95 people can be said that most of them are skilled, and at least 50 people are proficient in technology. At least twenty or thirty people can be said to be very skilled, and all theories, technologies, indicators and formulas are under control. But cruelly, only 4 out of this 100 people make money. This can be a cruel explanation that the technology is not enough for stock trading. . . . . hahahaha
So how do these only four people make money? If it is luck, it can't be said, and it can't be said for a long time, because it is impossible to become a rich man by holding one or two stocks for a long time, unless he is a rich man himself, and it is impossible for a rich man to make a fortune by eating stocks. Then he must have technology, and it must be real technology. Must be a master surfer, able to operate back and forth, shuttle back and forth in the rain of bullets, and maximize capital appreciation. So what's his skill? Or stock theory? Indicators? Formula? Neither. . . . hahaha
Look at what Soros relies on for stock trading and futures. People certainly don't depend on what technology we have learned, although they can have many people studying this index and that formula. But his operation is definitely not based on these, and his people must also operate according to his judgment. He relies on philosophy.
Throughout the history of Chinese and foreign stocks, most of the cattle were eliminated by their own industries and defeated by gambling in time. The only one who has not been defeated is Soros, and the other can be said to be Buffett. They are all winners, but Buffett is a bit special or invincible, although the essential reasons for their success are similar. The only thing worth referring to is Soros. He is the one who can really beat the stock market, and his performance can also reflect his strength.
Stock trading is actually speculation, and every stock is actually like a person. You choose every stock, which is equivalent to choosing a person. This A-share is like a society. If you want to make money in this society, you must first understand this society and truly understand its essence. And this essence is the same as that of the whole society. To understand this, everyone has a different understanding and personality, and most people can't grasp the essence. You must understand the life stage of each stock and operate it. From this perspective, it takes considerable understanding and experience to make money in the stock market.