cause
1. Automated trading emphasizes probability. Only the correct probability is greater than the wrong probability, and the probability of doing the right order at one time is at least 70%. This figure is my estimate and has no practical reference value. It's hard for you to find this method in the first place. Personally, it takes at least one year from the beginning of thinking to the success of the experiment.
2. The time corresponding to each transaction procedure will not be the same. For example, when sorting the disk, your trading program is likely to fail. If the sensitivity is set too high, some bands may be ignored. If the sensitivity is too small, there may be continuous wrong orders. This problem is difficult to grasp.
3. The second rule determines that you need to make multiple trading procedures, because no trading procedure is omnipotent. This time will be extended again. And what kind of trend, what kind of trading procedures need us to judge. This gives us another chance to make a big mistake.
4. Personally, these indicators of MACD RSI KDJ are already mature procedural trading procedures. I think the experts who make these indicators are also considering making a feasible procedure. I think they are successful. These indicators have been recognized by most people and have stood the test of time because they have not been eliminated. It's just that no one has completely followed its instructions, which is enough to prove that the automated program is not feasible in a short time.
I'm just saying, it seems that we don't know how far software programming will develop in the future, and there may not be any master who will make super trading programs one day. At least at present, the application of computers in trading is not enough.
My QQ
1 183790948 If you have any questions, please add me.