Prices in the countries participating in the war will definitely rise, and war is consumption. Because war is often compared with financial resources, manpower and material resources, as the saying goes, if the military and horses are not moved, food and grass will come first, and without sufficient financial resources as the backing, the war will fail in nine cases out of ten. Post-war construction will indeed promote employment and production. This is the so-called breaking and standing, but the process of breaking is painful.

A big war should not be enough to change the RMB exchange rate. After all, China's national treasury is still abundant. Since the reform and opening up, 46% of the wealth created by the people has been turned over to the state, and the state has taken money from the state treasury to settle the exchange rate. However, if the scale of the war is too large, there should be a financial situation in the late Republic of China.

As for the housing problem, it will not be affected in the war: after all, weapons are becoming more and more advanced and the hit rate is high; The goal of both sides of the war should be the military strength of the other side; Coupled with the supervision of international public opinion, it should not hurt civilians ... it is even possible to learn from the Red Army to fight local tyrants and divide houses in order to buy people's hearts! Therefore, wartime housing is not a luxury.