One difficulty is that there is no system to follow. "No system" is not absolutely no system, but no system suitable for the new enterprise system. Although some enterprises have changed the system and changed their clothes, the system is still old; Change the soup without changing the medicine, this medicine is not symptomatic. On the surface, these systems, methods and measures are quite substantial, but they are not suitable until they are used. In the specific operation, we have to muddle along and "turn a blind eye".

Second, the difficulty is that it does not conform to the system. If enterprises keep pace with the times and improve the management system according to the requirements of the new system, there will be no difficulty in implementation, right? Of course, having a system is better than nothing. Having a system will at least test the courage of those who want to violate it. But having a system does not mean that people will automatically act according to the system. In some enterprises, the fund management is chaotic, and the general manager turns a deaf ear to the financial management system, mobilizing funds without authorization and blindly entering high-risk fields such as futures, stocks and foreign exchange speculation; Or set up small accounts for a few people or vested interests, instead of putting special funds into large accounts, and so on. It can be seen that although the system is big, it is more courageous than people; Although the system exists, it does not exist if it is not implemented.