The parameters of MACD indicator are different from those of KDJ, so MACD will fall behind. The key point in the figure is that the D value of KDJ is above 80, so the D value is passive. At this time, the dead fork effect of KDJ is weakened, that is to say, the dead fork does not have the normal downward effect, but the golden fork will still have the normal effect. Naturally, it can be considered that the D value is below 20, and the rising effect is not obvious when the golden fork is dead, but the effect is obvious when the dead fork is dead.

In the figure, MACD crosses the 0-axis driven by KDJ, indicating that the stock price will rise in the short term. At this time, just watch the MACD column close more than one order when it leaves DEA. Don't watch KDJ.

KDJ is a quick indicator, so it often crosses. In actual combat, it should be noted that deviation phenomenon and deviation establishment are two different concepts. The deviation between KDJ indicator and MACD indicator corresponds to different price levels. After the deviation of KDJ in the figure is established, the downward trend of J value is not deep, and it is repeatedly interspersed by the passivation of D value.

KDJ and MACD are the same in structure, usage and essence, but one is short-term and the other is medium-term. Just like the second hand and minute hand in a watch, they are all used for timing, but the cycle is different and the accuracy is different. Any usage of one indicator can be explained in another indicator in the same way.

KDJ and MACD can only be effective if they are linked together. MACD contains wave theory, which is really understood. Far above the wave theory, Gann and K-line form, it can explain why some K-line forms look the same, but the trend is completely different. It can be said responsibly that if you use K-line form and moving average to make stocks, it is just so-so. If you use it as stock index futures, you will die miserably.

The connection between KDJ and MACD is a science.