Re-examination is considered to be the most important way for Go players to improve their chess skills, especially when playing with high-level players, they can see their own lack of thinking from the perspective of others, thus turning other people's experience into their own use. The training method of Go players is simple: keep playing chess, repeat it simply, day after day, year after year. The method is the most monotonous, but also the most effective. Generally speaking, a repeat is a repeated time? Going? Process, actively think about why you want to go, how to design the next step, how to go next, from the perspective of chess, the resumption is a combination of offensive and defensive.

From the perspective of psychological warfare, we can better compare the psychological thinking of both sides and finally sum up the so-called? Routine? . What time? Routine? If you practice hard, you will naturally reach the level of a master. ? Replay? This practice is not in accordance with the established model. This is like asking a chess master why a certain move will go like this, and he may tell you, because this move has pinned down the opponent's position in one place and formed a counterattack in another place.

But don't try to remember the truth of this move, because the game is Qian Qian, and you may never encounter this situation again, so what if you simply live it? Recite the chess book? To repeat the sequence, and you still can't solve similar problems in the future? It is important to understand the principle behind this incident. So the most important thing is to find the loopholes and advantages, evaluate the significance of the behavior, sum up and reflect, and do better next time. The most direct benefit of the resumption is to hone our thinking ability and prevent us from making mistakes in the same place to the greatest extent.

If you fail to do something, you should not only get it? I failed? Or? I'm not fit for this task? Conclusion, but also know what constitutes failure: psychological factors? Insufficient information? Still no actual combat experience? If every factor has it, it can't be mixed and analyzed. It is more important to be accurate about specific things and know exactly which step is wrong. Just like a chess player, he must know which move is not good enough, which is not enough.